SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANISATION
1. Context
2. About Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
- The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is a Eurasian political, economic, international security and defence organisation.
- It is the world's largest regional organization in terms of geographic scope and population, covering approximately 60% of the area of Eurasia, and 40% of the world's population. Its combined GDP is around 20% of global GDP.
- The SCO was founded in 2001 by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
2.1. Structure
The SCO has several bodies that oversee its activities, including
- The Council of Heads of State, which is the supreme decision-making body of the SCO.
- The Council of Heads of Government, which is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the decisions of the Council of Heads of State.
- The Council of Foreign Ministers, which is responsible for coordinating the foreign policies of the SCO member states.
- The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS), which is responsible for combating terrorism, separatism and extremism in the SCO region and
- The SCO Secretariat, which is responsible for the day-to-day running of the organization.
2.2. Members
- The SCO has eight full members China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
- It also has six observer states Afghanistan, Belarus, Iran, Mongolia, Nepal and Sri Lanka.
- And six dialogue partners Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Egypt, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
2.3. Goals
- Political and security cooperation, including the fight against terrorism, separatism and extremism
- Economic cooperation, including trade, investment, energy and transportation
- Cultural and humanitarian cooperation and
- Coordination of positions on major international issues.
3. Criticism
- The SCO has been criticized by some for being a tool of Chinese and Russian imperialism.
- However, the organization has also been praised for its role in promoting stability and security in Central Asia.
4. The Way Forward
- The SCO has been expanding its membership in recent years, and it may continue to do so in the future.
- The organization is seen by some as a potential rival to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and its growing influence is being watched closely by the United States and its allies.
For Prelims: SCO, NATO, India, Central Asia, United States, China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, terrorism,
For Mains:
1. Examine the potential challenges and opportunities for India as a full member of the SCO, highlighting its implications for India's political, economic, and security interests. (250 Words)
|
Previous Year Questions
1. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Heads of State Summit was held on 10th November, 2020 in the video conference format. The Summit was hosted by: (OPSC OAS 2021)
A. Russia B. India C. Kazakhstan D. Uzbekistan
Answer: A
2. The Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) was hosted by which country from 15-16 September 2022? (Rajasthan CET 2023)
A. Kazakhstan B. Tajikistan C. Uzbekistan D. India
Answer: C
3. The area known as 'Golan Heights' sometimes appears in the news in the context of the events related to (UPSC 2015)
A. Central Asia B. Middle East C. South-East Asia D. Central Africa
Answer: B
4. Siachen Glacier is situated to the (UPSC 2020)
A. East of Aksai Chin B. East of Leh C. North of Gilgit D. North of Nubra Valley
Answer: D
|
SMALL INDUSTRIES
Classification of Industries |
Classification/ Industry type | Micro | Small | Medium |
Investment | Not more than Rs.1 crore | Not more than Rs.10 crore | Not more than Rs.50 crore |
Annual Turnover | Not more than Rs. 5 crore | Not more than Rs. 50 crore | Not more than Rs. 250 crore |
- Expansion of Entrepreneurial Activities: The innovative approaches adopted by small industries have contributed to the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. This expansion has brought more economic sectors into the fold, offering a broader range of goods and services that cater to both domestic and international markets.
- Industrialization of Rural and Underdeveloped Areas: Small industries have helped reduce regional disparities, promoting a more equitable distribution of wealth and income throughout the nation.
- Employment Creation: Small industries are crucial to India's economic development, as they generate significant employment opportunities at a much lower capital investment compared to large-scale industries
Village Small Industries (VSI)
The term "Village and Small Industry (VSI)" is commonly used to refer to unorganized traditional sectors and small-scale industries. The VSI sector is composed of seven sub-sectors: handicrafts, handlooms, Khadi and Village Industries, coir, sericulture, power looms, and small-scale industries
|
- Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): The aim of this program is to create employment opportunities by establishing new micro-enterprises, projects, and self-employment initiatives across rural and urban areas of the country. The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) serves as the national nodal agency responsible for implementing the scheme, while its execution at the state level is managed by State KVIC offices, State Khadi and Village Industries Boards (KVIB), District Industries Centres (DIC), Coir Board (for coir-related activities), and Banks.
- Collateral-Free Credit Provision for MSMEs: Banks and other financial institutions, including NBFCs, are mandated to provide collateral-free credit to Micro and Small Enterprises. The scheme ensures that up to ₹5 crore (effective from April 1, 2023) per borrowing unit is covered for collateral-free credit facilities (term loans and/or working capital) extended to micro and small enterprises by eligible lending institutions.
- A Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industry & Entrepreneurship (ASPIRE): The ASPIRE program has been approved for continuation from 2021-2022 to 2025-2026 with a budget allocation of ₹194.87 crore. Updated guidelines issued on January 28, 2022, focus on the following objectives:
- Reducing unemployment and generating jobs,
- Promoting an entrepreneurial culture in India,
- Encouraging innovation to enhance the competitiveness of the MSME sector.
- Entrepreneurship and Skill Development Programmes (ESDP): This program is designed to inspire youth from diverse social backgrounds, including women, SC/ST communities, disabled individuals, ex-servicemen, and those below the poverty line, to consider careers in self-employment or entrepreneurship.
- Scheme of Fund for Regeneration of Traditional Industries (SFURTI): The scheme aims to create competitive, sustainable employment opportunities for traditional industries and artisans by organizing them into clusters. It also seeks to enhance the marketability of products produced by these clusters, upgrade the skills of traditional artisans, provide better tools and equipment, strengthen cluster governance with active stakeholder participation, and foster innovative products, advanced technologies, processes, market intelligence, and new models of public-private partnerships.
- MSME Champions Scheme: This program, set to run from 2021-2022 to 2025-2026, is divided into three components:
- MSME-Sustainable (ZED) Certification Scheme
- MSME-Competitive (Lean) Scheme
- MSME-Innovative (for Incubation, IPR, and Design) Scheme
- Greening MSME: SIDBI has introduced the "Greening MSME" initiative, which offers financial assistance up to a maximum of ₹20 crore to MSMEs for adopting energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable technologies
- Access to Finance: Access to funding is a major challenge for Indian MSMEs, with the total financing gap expected to reach $400 billion. While closing this gap will take time, targeted green finance initiatives in areas like waste management, electric vehicles, energy efficiency, and renewables can support MSME growth in these sectors.
- Interest Rates: The Central Government should lower interest rates and make consumer finance, housing loans, and vehicle loans more accessible to stimulate market demand.
- Climate Commitments and Transitioning to Low-Carbon: Small enterprises are limited to adhering to environmental regulations, while global supply chains increasingly shift to greener processes and products. There is currently no strategic plan to help MSMEs manage the risks associated with this transition.
- Unorganized Nature: Due to its fragmented structure and the predominance of micro-sized businesses, the MSME sector is one of the most vulnerable in the Indian economy. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted this vulnerability, with millions of MSMEs facing closure due to decreased demand caused by lockdowns.
- Green Transition of MSMEs: MSMEs are more exposed to policy and demand uncertainties, often with greater downside risks. Even if they recognize the benefits of going green, most lack the financial and technical capacity to invest in new initiatives. However, certain government programs can help address these barriers.
- Incentives and Penalties: Encouraging Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to exceed mere compliance can be achieved by taxing negative externalities and offering subsidies or tax breaks for green investments. Updating environmental legislation should also consider the risks posed by different industries, and these policies should be assessed for their impact on MSMEs before widespread implementation
MSMEs should embrace best practices like implementing low-energy strategies, adopting renewable energy sources, improving waste management, ensuring women's safety, and making timely wage payments.
Governments, business associations, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders can play a proactive role in promoting awareness, sharing best practices, and providing training and resources. Financial incentives, such as tax breaks, subsidies, grants, and low-interest loans, can be offered by governments and investors to encourage MSMEs to adopt sustainable practices or invest in sustainable technologies.
Larger companies can support MSMEs in adopting sustainable practices by offering training, technical support, and financial assistance
For Prelims: Current events of national and international importance For Mains: GS III - Indian Economy |
Previous year Questions1. Consider the following statements with reference to India: (UPSC 2023)
1. According to the 'Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006', the 'medium enterprises' are those with investments in plant and machinery between Rs. 15 crore and Rs. 25 crore.
2. All bank loans to the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises qualify under the priority sector.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: B
2. Which of the following can aid in furthering the Government's objective of inclusive growth? (UPSC 2011)
1. Promoting Self-Help Groups
2. Promoting Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
3. Implementing the Right to Education Act
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
A. 1 only
B. 1 and 2 only
C. 2 and 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3
Answer: D
|
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
- Seven years after the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) halfway to the 2030 deadline the visionary promises of no poverty, zero hunger, good health and well-being, social justice and a rights-based, equitable and ecologically just world for all appear to be a distant dream.
- The Global People’s Assembly (GPA), organised by the Global Call to Action against Poverty (GCAP) during the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2022, highlighted the fact that nations across the globe have failed to achieve both human security and climate change mitigation
- GPA voiced the concerns of 1,300 civil society participants from 127 countries representing diverse, excluded and marginalised people.
- The 2019 Social Progress Index, compiled by the United States-based non-profit Social Progress Imperative, ranked 149 countries’ social performance over the past five years. It forecast that at the current trends, the world will not meet the 2030 targets for SDGs until 2073 more than four decades past their target date
- It maintained that the biggest areas of underperformance are related to water and sanitation, nutrition, basic healthcare and shelter
- In Keonjhar district of Odisha, Out of 65 families in the village, multiple members of 45 families were affected by kidney ailments
- Occurrence of unnatural deaths at an average age of 45 has been a trend for the last several decades
- The residents blamed it on the quality of water they have to consume from the local sources
- Various government schemes for poverty alleviation, free housing, job guarantee and social security pension have failed to provide the villagers a secured and dignified life
- The Indian government’s endeavours towards localising the SDGs, which emphasises on aligning the local plans of the states and the Union territories with the SDGs scheme, seem to be quite promising
- However, they are still at a nascent stage and the result is yet to be reflected on the ground.
- African countries are performing poorly in all aspects of SDGs, especially poverty, hunger, education, peace and justice
- The condition of people living in informal settlements in African countries like Kenya is miserable, Jane Anyango, director of Polycom, an organisation that works for women living in informal settlements, pointed out at the GPA
- The residents who already suffer scarcity of drinking water had a hard time maintaining hand hygiene
- Many people died of COVID-19 because they could not afford protective measures and medical facilities, she elaborated
- People in Kenya are losing hope and cases of suicide are shooting up in the current drought situation
- Vaccine inequality between the countries of global South and Global North in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is a serious matter of concern, pointed out people’s representatives at the GPA
- Countries like Haiti, Madagascar and Nigeria had never heard of life saving antivirals for COVID despite being accessible widely in the global north, said Dr Fifa Rahman, civil society representative of the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator
- ACT-Accelerator is a global collaboration to accelerate development, production, and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments, and vaccines
- The GPA urged the nations to establish a global roadmap for vaccine equality to ensure free and universal access to all vaccines and treatments, prioritising the most marginalized countries, people and communities to ensure that No One is Left Behind
- Apart from the pandemic and human rights crises, the world is also faced with a climate crisis. Most nations have done “too little, too late” towards achieving SDG 13 (climate action)
- Developing countries like India and Kenya as well as industrialised countries like the European Union, the United Kingdom and South Africa are on track to achieving goals associated with limiting global warming to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels
- However, developed countries like the US, Japan and Canada are lagging behind the target
- #FridaysForFuture is a youth-led global movement joined by thousands on the streets of New York on Fridays to put pressure on the leaders to catalyse climate actions to secure a peaceful, clean and green planet for the future
- The global- and national-level planning to achieve SDGs must incorporate the points of the declaration prepared by GPA
- It has galvanised the voices of the most marginalised communities and focused on issues like vaccine equality, democracy and human rights, gender equity, needs to meet Paris Climate Agreement as well as debt and economic justice
For Prelims: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Paris Climate Agreement, ACT-accelerator
For Mains:
1. Sustainable development does not stop at the Sustainability of the environment. It also requires sustainability of economic and Social Systems. Comment (250 Words)
|
Previous year Questions:
1. Consider the following statements
1. The Sustainable Development Goals were first proposed in 1972 by a global think tank called the 'Club of Rome
2. Sustainable Development goals has to be achieved by the year 2030
Which of the statements given above is/ are correct
A. 1 Only B. 2 Only C. Both 1 and 2 D. Neither 1 Nor 2
Answer (B)
|
CAR T-CELL THERAPY
1. Context
2. What is CAR T- Cell therapy?
3. What are CAR T-Cells?
- Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies represent a quantum leap in the sophistication of cancer treatment. Unlike chemotherapy or immunotherapy, which require massproduced injectable or oral medication, CAR T-cell therapies use a patient’s own cells.
- They are modified in the laboratory to activate T-cells, a component of immune cells, to attack tumors. These modified cells are then infused back into the patient’s bloodstream after conditioning them to multiply more effectively.
- The cells are even more specific than targeted agents and directly activate the patient’s immune system against cancer, making the treatment more clinically effective. This is why they’re called ‘living drugs’.

4. How does it work?
- The therapy targets leukaemia and lymphoma. Leukaemia is a cancer of blood-forming tissues, including bone marrow. Lymphoma is a cancer of the lymphatic system, which is part of the body's germ-fighting network.
- It uses lentiviral technology. In gene therapy, this is a method of inserting, modifying or deleting genes in organisms using lentivirus, a family of viruses responsible for diseases such as AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).
- As a part of the treatment, a specific type of white blood cells and T cells are changed in the lab so they can find and destroy cancer cells.
- It is also sometimes referred to as a type of cell-based gene therapy because it involves altering genes inside T cells to help them attack cancerous cells.
5. How has systemic therapy evolved?
- Systemic therapy’s earliest form was chemotherapy; when administered, it preferentially acts on cancer cells because of the latter’s rapid, unregulated growth and poor healing mechanisms.
- Chemotherapeutic drugs have modest response rates and significant side effects as they affect numerous cell types in the body.
- The next stage in its evolution was targeted agents, also known as immunotherapy. Here the drugs bind to specific targets on cancer or on the immune cells that help the tumour grow or spread.
- This method often has fewer side effects as the impact on non tumour cells is limited. However, it is effective only against tumours that express these targets.
6. Will it be an expensive treatment in India?
- In India, introducing any new therapy faces the twin challenges of cost and value.
- Critics argue that developing facilities in India may be redundant and/or inappropriate as even when it becomes cheaper, CAR T-cell therapy will be unaffordable to most Indians.
- Those who are affluent and require the therapy currently receive it abroad anyway.
- While this is true, it may be the right answer to the wrong question. Having access to a global standard of care is every patient’s right; how it can be made more affordable can be the next step.
- Investments in developing these technologies in India represent the hope that, as with other initially expensive treatments like robotic surgery, we will be able to provide economies of scale.
- The sheer volume of patients in India has the potential to drive the cost of treatment down.
For Prelims & Mains
For Prelims: CAR T-Cells, CAR T- Cell therapy, Surgery, Radiotherapy, Systemic therapy, Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), Chemotherapy or immunotherapy, Lentivirus, and Cell-based gene therapy.
For Mains: 1. What is CAR T- Cell therapy? Explain how it works and in what type of cancer can it be used.
|
INDUS WATER TREATY
1. Context
2. Is unilateral suspension permissible?
-
The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) cannot be modified or terminated by one country alone. Article XII explicitly states that the agreement may only be ended through a "duly ratified treaty" mutually accepted by both India and Pakistan.
-
India’s reference to placing the treaty “in abeyance” in its communication with Pakistan lacks legal grounding, as international law and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), 1969—which serves as the foundational framework for international agreements—do not recognize this term.
-
Under Article 62 of the VCLT, a treaty may be withdrawn from if there has been a “fundamental change of circumstances” compared to when it was first signed.
-
Although India is not a signatory and Pakistan has signed but not ratified the VCLT, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its ruling on the Fisheries Jurisdiction cases, recognized Article 62 as part of customary international law—making it applicable even without formal ratification.
-
India appears to be appealing to this legal doctrine in its letter, which emphasized that a “fundamental change in circumstances” warrants a reassessment of its commitments under the IWT.
-
For instance, in the 1997 Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros case involving Hungary and Slovakia’s dam project, Hungary claimed that evolving political and economic conditions, along with potential environmental risks, justified ending the treaty.
-
The ICJ dismissed these claims, asserting that the cited changes were not directly tied to the treaty’s central goal of cooperative energy generation
3.How will this have effect on Pakistan?
- Over 80% of Pakistan’s agricultural activities and nearly one-third of its hydropower production rely on the Indus basin's water resources.
- Despite this heavy dependence, analysts point out that India does not have the extensive water storage facilities or a widespread canal network necessary to retain the vast volumes—tens of billions of cubic metres—of water from the western rivers.
- India’s existing infrastructure primarily comprises run-of-the-river hydropower projects, which are not designed for significant water storage.
- Nevertheless, the primary concern lies in the unpredictability of water flows, which poses a serious threat to Pakistan’s largely agriculture-based economy
4. Applications moved by Pakistan and India earlier
- The World Bank, the third party to the Treaty and the acknowledged arbiter of disputes were, meanwhile faced with a unique situation of having received two separate requests for the same dispute.
- New Delhi feels that the World Bank is just a facilitator and has a limited role.
- On December 12, 2016, the World Bank announced a "pause" in the separate processes initiated by India and Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty to allow the two countries to consider alternative ways to resolve their disagreements.
- The regular meetings of Indus Waters Commissioners resumed in 2017 and India tried to use these to find mutually agreeable solutions between 2017 and 2022.
- Pakistan refused to discuss these issues at these meetings.
- At Pakistan's continued insistence, the World Bank, in March last year, initiated actions on the requests of both India and Pakistan.
On March 31, 2022, the World Bank decided to resume the process of appointing a Neutral Expert and a Chairman for the Court of Arbitration.
In October last year, the Bank named Michel Lino as the Neutral Expert and Prof. Sean Murphy as Chairman of the Court of Arbitration.
|
- They will carry out their duties in their capacity as subject matter experts and independently of any other appointments they may currently hold.
- On October 19, 2022, the Ministry of External Affairs said, " We have noted the World Bank's announcement to concurrently appoint a Neutral Expert and a Chair of the Court of Arbitration in the ongoing matter related to the Kishanganga and Ratle projects".
- Recognising the World Bank's admission in its announcement that "carrying out two processes concurrently poses practical and legal challenges".
- India would assess the matter that "India believes that the implementation of the Indus Water Treaty must be in the letter and spirit of the Treaty".
- Such parallel consideration of the same issues is not provided for in any provisions of the Treaty and India has been repeatedly citing the possibility of the two processes delivering contradictory rulings, which could lead to an unprecedented and legally untenable situation, which is unforeseen in Treaty provisions.
5. Dispute redressal mechanism
- The dispute redressal mechanism provided under Article IX of the IWT is graded.
- It's a 3-level mechanism.
- So, whenever India plans to start a project, under the Indus Water Treaty, it has to inform Pakistan that it is planning to build a project.
- Pakistan might oppose it and ask for more details. That would mean there is a question and in case there is a question, that question has to be clarified between the two sides at the level of the Indus Commissioners.
- If that difference is not resolved by them, then the level is raised. The question then becomes a difference.
- That difference is to be resolved by another set mechanism, which is the Natural Expert.
- It is at this stage that the World Bank comes into the picture.
- In case the Neutral Expert says that they are not able to resolve the difference or that the issue needs an interpretation of the Treaty, then that difference becomes a dispute.
It then goes to the third stage the Court of Arbitration. - To Sum up, it's a very graded and sequential mechanism first Commissioner, then the Neutral Expert and only then the Court of Arbitration.
6. India's notice and its implications
- While the immediate provocation for the modification is to address the issue of two parallel mechanisms, at this point, the implications of India's notice for modifying the treaty are not very clear.
- Article XII (3) of the Treaty that India has invoked is not a dispute redressal mechanism.
- It is in effect, a provision to amend the Treaty.
- However, an amendment or modification can happen only through a "duly ratified Treaty concluded for that purpose between the two governments".
- Pakistan is under no obligation to agree to India's proposal.
- As of now, it is not clear what happens if Pakistan does not respond to India's notice within 90 days.
The next provision in the Treaty, Article XII (4), provides for the termination of the Treaty through a similar process " a duly ratified Treaty concluded for that the purpose between the two governments". |
- India has not spelt out exactly what it wants to be modified in the Treaty.
- But over the last few years, especially since the Uri attack, there has been a growing demand in India to use the Indus Waters Treaty as a strategic tool, considering that India has the natural advantage of being the upper riparian state.
- India has not fully utilized its rights over the waters of the three east-flowing rivers Ravi, Beas and Sutlej over which India has full control under the Treaty.
It has also not adequately utilized the limited rights over the three west-flowing rivers Indus, Chenab and Jhelum which are meant for Pakistan. - Following the Uri attack, India established a high-level task force to exploit the full potential of the Indus Waters Treaty.
- Accordingly, India has been working to start several big and small hydroelectric projects that had either been stalled or were in the planning stages.
- A river system consists of a river and all its tributaries. The Indus River system is made up of six rivers: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. Among these, the Indus and Sutlej are antecedent rivers, meaning they existed before the formation of the Himalayas and carved deep gorges as they flowed from the Tibet region. The remaining four rivers—Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, and Beas—originate in India.
- The Indus Basin stretches across four countries: China, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. In India, it covers the Union Territories of Ladakh and Jammu and Kashmir, as well as Chandigarh, and the states of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. The total drainage area of the basin is about 3,21,289 square kilometers, representing roughly 9.8% of India’s total geographical area.
- The Indus River originates from the trans-Himalayan range near Mansarovar Lake in Tibet, known as Singi Khamban or the Lion’s Mouth. Flowing west, it enters India at Demchok in Ladakh.
- Within India, the river runs for about 1,114 kilometers, flowing between the Ladakh and Karakoram ranges. Its main right bank tributaries include the Shyok (originating from Rimo Glacier), Shigar, and Gilgit, while the Zaskar and Hanle rivers are its left bank tributaries. The Indus River travels a total of 2,880 kilometers, eventually emptying into the Arabian Sea near Karachi, Pakistan. The Indus River Dolphin, listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), primarily inhabits the Indus.
- The Jhelum River (252 km) begins at Verinag near the Pir Panjal in India, flowing through Wular Lake in Srinagar before entering Pakistan, where it merges with the Chenab near Jhang. The Chenab River, the Indus’s largest tributary, is 1,180 km long within India and originates from the confluence of the Chandra and Bhaga rivers at Tandi in Keylong, Himachal Pradesh.
- The Ravi River (95 km) starts from the Kullu Hills near Rohtang Pass in Himachal Pradesh and joins the Chenab at Sarai Sidhu in Pakistan. The Beas River (354 km) originates from Beas Kund, located at 4,000 meters above sea level near Rohtang Pass. It flows through the Kullu Valley and joins the Sutlej near Harike in Punjab, India. The Harike Barrage, built in 1952, diverts water for the Indira Gandhi Canal system.
- The Sutlej River (676 km) is another antecedent river, originating from Rakas Tal (4,555 meters above sea level) near Mansarovar in Tibet. It enters India near Ropar. India has built several important dams to harness the waters of the eastern rivers, including the Ranjit Sagar Dam on the Ravi, the Bhakra Dam on the Sutlej, and the Pong and Pandoh Dams on the Beas. These projects, including the Beas-Sutlej Link, the Madhopur-Beas Link, and the Indira Gandhi Canal Project, allow India to utilize nearly 95% of the waters of these eastern rivers.
8. Way Forward
However, India’s projects on the western rivers have been a source of dispute with Pakistan. Significant projects on the western rivers, such as the Salal Dam, the Baglihar Hydropower Project, the Pakal Dul Project, and the Kiru Project, are located on the Chenab River, while the Tulbul Project is situated on the Jhelum River in Jammu and Kashmir. These projects have been at the center of objections from Pakistan over the year
For Prelims & Mains
For Prelims: Indus water treaty, World Bank, India and Pakistan, Ravi, Jhelum, Sutlej, Beas, Chennab, Court of Arbitration, Uri attack, Neutral Expert, hydel projects,
For Mains:
1. What is Indus Water Treaty and discuss India's recent notice and its implications (250 Words)
|
Previous Year Questions
1.With reference to the Indus river system, of the following four rivers, three of them pour into one of them which joins the Indus directly. Among the following, which one is such a river that joins the Indus direct? (2021) (a) Chenab (b) Jhelum (c) Ravi (d) Sutle 2.Consider the following pairs (2019)
Answer (d) Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched? (a) 1, 2 and 4 (b) 1, 3 and 4 (c) 2 and 5 (d) 3 and 5 Answer (a) Mains 1.The interlinking of rivers can provide viable solutions to the multi-dimensional inter-related problems of droughts, floods, and interrupted navigation. Critically examine. (2020) |
ARTICLE 356
1. Context
2. Article 356
- Article 356 of the Constitution of India gives the President of India power to suspend state government and impose President's rule of any state in the country "if he is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on by the provisions of the Constitution.
- It is also known as a "State Emergency" or "Constitutional Emergency".
- Upon the imposition of this rule, there would be no council of Ministers.
- The state will fall under the direct control of the Union government, and the Governor will continue to head the proceedings, representing the President of India.
3. Parliamentary approval and Duration
- A proclamation imposing President's Rule must be approved by both the House of Parliament within two months from the date of its issue.
- The approval takes place through a simple majority in either House, that is, a majority of the members of the House present and voting.
- Initially valid for six months, the President's Rule can be extended for a maximum period of three years with the approval of the Parliament, every six months.
4. Report of the Governor
- Under Article 356, President's Rule is imposed if the President, upon receipt of the report from the Governor of the state or otherwise, is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state cannot be carried on by the provisions of the Constitution.
- A proclamation of the President's Rule may be revoked by the President at any time by a subsequent proclamation. Such a proclamation does not require parliamentary approval.
5. Origins of Article 356
- Article 356 was inspired by section 93 of the Government of India Act, of 1935. This provided that if a Governor of a province was satisfied that a situation had arisen in which the government of the province cannot be carried on by the provisions of the said Act, he could assume to himself all or any of the powers of the government and discharge those functions in his discretion.
- The Governor, could not encroach upon the powers of the high court. For the British, this provision allowed for a 'controlled democracy'-while providing some autonomy to provincial governments, section 93 allowed the British authorities to exercise ultimate power when they deemed necessary.
6. How was the provision used as a political weapon in independent India?
- During the decades of Congress's dominance at the Centre, Article 356 was used against governments of the Left and regional parties in the states.
- Until 1959, Jawaharlal Nehru's government had used the article six times, including to dislodge the first-ever elected communist government in the world, in Kerela in 1959.
- In the 1960s, it was used 11 times. After Indira came to power in 1966, Article 356 was used seven times between 1967 and 1969 alone.
- The 1970s were more politically turbulent. Between 1970 and 1974, President's Rule was imposed 19 times.
- Post Emergency, the Janata party government used it in 1977 to summarily dismiss nine congress-state governments. When Indira returned to power in 1980, her government too imposed president's Rule in nine states.
- In 1992-93, Prime Minister Narasimha Rao dismissed three BJP governments in the wake of the demolition of Babri Masjid, besides Kalyan Singh's government in UP.
7. Article 356 and its Safeguards
- The 1994 Supreme Court (S.R.Bommai case) majority decision, in essence, overturned a long tradition that the use of Article 356 was not subject to review by courts, a doctrine articulated in a landmark 1997 case, State of Rajasthan Vs Union of India.
- The Bommai case verdict laid down the conditions under which state governments may be dismissed, and the mechanisms for that process.
- In the S.R. Bommai case, a nine-member bench of the supreme court construed the scope of Article 356, which also allows the imposition of the President's Rule in the states, with stringent conditions.
- These included ascertaining whether objective conditions exist which render it impossible to carry out governance in the state where the proclamation has been made and the process has to be approved by both Houses of Parliament before consideration for Judicial review.
For Prelims & Mains
For Prelims: Article 356, State Emergency, President, Parliament, Government of India Act, of 1935, Lok sabha, Rajya Sabha, S.R.Bommai case and section 93 of the Government of India Act, of 1935.
For Mains:
1.Explain how Article 356 is used as a political weapon in independent India and discuss its safeguards.
|
CASTE CENSUS
A caste census is a comprehensive survey or data collection effort that aims to gather detailed information about the caste composition of a population. This typically involves:
- Counting individuals belonging to different caste groups
- Collecting socio-economic data related to caste categories
- Assessing the representation of various castes in different sectors
The caste system is particularly relevant in India, where it has historically played a significant role in social stratification. A caste census can provide insights into:
- Population distribution across caste groups
- Economic status of different castes
- Educational levels and employment patterns
- Representation in government jobs and political positions
In India, the last comprehensive caste census was conducted in 1931 during British rule. Since then, calls for a new caste census have been made periodically, with proponents arguing it would help in formulating more targeted welfare policies and ensuring equitable representation.
3. Why the Caste Census?
Historically, British India’s censuses from 1881 to 1931 recorded all castes. Post-Independence, the 1951 census excluded caste enumeration, except for SCs and STs, which continued to be recorded in every census. In 1961, the government allowed states to conduct their own OBC surveys and create state-specific OBC lists, as there were no central reservations for OBCs at that time
A caste census is essential for several reasons:
-
Social Necessity: Caste remains a fundamental social framework in India. Inter-caste marriages were just 5% in 2011-12. Caste surnames and markers are common, residential areas are segregated by caste, and caste influences the selection of election candidates and cabinet ministers.
-
Legal Necessity: Effective implementation of constitutionally mandated social justice policies, including reservations in elections, education, and public employment, requires detailed caste data. Despite the Constitution using the term 'class,' Supreme Court rulings have established caste as a significant criterion for defining a backward class, necessitating comprehensive caste-wise data to uphold reservation policies.
-
Administrative Necessity: Detailed caste data helps correct wrongful inclusions and exclusions within reserved categories, prevents dominant castes from monopolizing reserved benefits, and is essential for sub-categorizing castes and determining the creamy layer's income/wealth criteria.
-
Moral Necessity: The lack of detailed caste data has allowed a small elite among upper castes and dominant OBCs to disproportionately control the nation's resources, income, and power
There are several arguments against conducting a caste census:
-
Social Division: Some argue that a caste census would exacerbate social divisions, although India's social hierarchies have existed for nearly 3,000 years, predating census efforts. Since 1951, counting SCs and STs has not led to conflicts among these groups. Moreover, India’s census already includes data on religion, language, and region, which are equally, if not more, divisive than caste. Ignoring caste in the census will not eliminate casteism any more than excluding religion, language, and region data will eradicate communalism and regionalism.
-
Administrative Challenge: Some claim that a caste census would be administratively complex. However, unlike the concept of race, which can be ambiguous but is still counted in many countries like the U.S., caste identification in India is relatively clear. The government has successfully enumerated 1,234 SC castes and 698 ST tribes. Therefore, counting the approximately 4,000 other castes, most of which are specific to certain states, should not pose an insurmountable challenge.
-
Increased Reservation Demands: Critics suggest that a caste census could lead to more demands for reservations. However, detailed caste data could actually help manage these demands more effectively by providing a factual basis for discussions. This would enable policymakers to address reservation claims more objectively, such as those from Marathas, Patidars, and Jats. In contrast, governments often prefer vague data because it allows them to make arbitrary reservation decisions for electoral gain
- The Constitution allows reservations for OBCs in education (Article 15(4)) and public employment (Article 16(4)), similar to SCs and STs. Following the Mandal Commission's recommendations, OBCs also benefit from reservations in the Central government and its undertakings. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Indra Sawhney case (1992) emphasized that the OBC list, originally based on the 1931 Census, should be updated regularly.
- Unlike SCs and STs, OBCs do not have reserved electoral constituencies for MPs and MLAs. However, the 73rd and 74th Constitutional amendments (1993) introduced reservations for OBCs in panchayats and municipalities (Articles 243D(6) and 243T(6)). To implement this effectively, detailed caste and area-wise Census data of OBCs is necessary, which the government should have collected in the 2001 Census but did not.
- When states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Odisha, and Jharkhand attempted to implement OBC reservations in local elections, courts halted these efforts due to the lack of caste-wise OBC data. The judiciary demands this data to uphold reservations, while the executive has avoided collecting it.
- In contrast, the Supreme Court upheld the 10% reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) among non-OBCs, SCs, and STs (mainly upper castes) in 2022 without empirical support. Given the EWS reservation, the Census should now include all castes, as it did until 1931.
- Though the Census is a Union subject, the Collection of Statistics Act, 2008, allows States and local bodies to collect relevant data. States like Karnataka (2015) and Bihar (2023) have conducted caste surveys, but Census data holds more authority and is less disputed. The government's reluctance to include caste in the Census is both legally indefensible and administratively imprudent
- After extensive lobbying by OBC leaders, Parliament unanimously resolved in 2010, with support from both Congress and BJP, to include caste enumeration in the 2011 Census. The last such enumeration was in the 1931 Census, which recorded 4,147 castes in India, excluding the depressed classes/untouchables.
- However, the Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) of 2011 was poorly designed and executed, resulting in an absurd figure of 4.6 million castes, and its results were never released.
- The failure of SECC-2011 can be attributed to its conduct outside the framework of the Census Act, 1948, which was not amended to include caste as a parameter. Instead, it was managed by the Union Ministries of Rural Development and Urban Development, which lacked experience in conducting sociological surveys.
- Additionally, the questionnaire was poorly designed with open-ended questions about caste, causing confusion among enumerators who struggled to differentiate between genuine castes, alternative names, larger caste groups, sub-castes, surnames, clan names, and gotras. In contrast, Bihar's 2023 Caste Survey provided a list of 214 specific caste names, with a 215th category labeled "Other Castes," resulting in more accurate data.
- Despite the 2010 unanimous Parliamentary resolution, the Central government announced in 2021 that it would not include caste enumeration in the next Census.
- It maintained this stance before the Supreme Court in response to a case filed by the Maharashtra government seeking the inclusion of OBCs in the 2021 Census. The Supreme Court's dismissal of Maharashtra's plea in December 2021 is contentious, given its own previous rulings
For Prelims: Socio-economic and caste census (SECC), Mandal Commission, Justice G Rohini's Commission, NITI Aayog, Article 341 and Article 342.
For Mains: 1. General Studies II: Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States and the performance of these schemes; mechanisms, laws, institutions and Bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these vulnerable sections
|
CERTIFICATION OF FILMS
- The Supreme Court has declared that the ban on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka violates the filmmakers' constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression. The Court instructed the state authorities to uphold the “rule of law” and ensure the film’s unhindered release.
- On June 17, the apex court strongly criticized the “extra-judicial ban” imposed on the film, emphasizing that any movie approved by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) must be allowed to be screened.
- Directed by Mani Ratnam, Thug Life was released nationwide on June 5, except in Karnataka, where its screening was halted due to backlash over a statement by lead actor Kamal Haasan, who claimed that the Kannada language originated from Tamil.
- In light of these events, it becomes important to explore the constitutional framework surrounding freedom of expression and the process of film certification in India
-
Article 19(1)(a), found in Part III of the Indian Constitution, ensures the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. This right is enforceable specifically against the state. While certain fundamental rights, such as the abolition of untouchability, prohibition of human trafficking, and bonded labour, apply to both the state and individuals, the right to free speech is directed primarily at government action.
-
This right is exclusively granted to Indian citizens and does not extend to foreign nationals. Article 19(1) outlines the ‘Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.’ It affirms that every citizen has the right:
(a) to express their views freely;
(b) to gather peacefully without weapons;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely within the country;
(e) to live and settle in any part of India;
(f) [omitted];
(g) to practise any profession or to carry out any occupation, trade, or business. -
However, the rights under Article 19(1) are not unrestricted. Article 19(2) specifies circumstances under which the state can impose “reasonable restrictions” on free speech, including concerns related to:
→ National security,
→ International relations,
→ Maintenance of public order,
→ Standards of decency or morality,
→ Judicial integrity (Contempt of Court),
→ Protection of individual reputation (Defamation),
→ Prevention of incitement to crime, and
→ Sovereignty and integrity of India.
Originally, the right to property was part of Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31, allowing citizens to own and dispose of property, subject to state acquisition for public purposes. However, this was removed as a fundamental right through the 44th Constitutional Amendment in 1978, which eliminated Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31 from the Constitution |
-
In India, films intended for theatrical release, television broadcast, or any form of public exhibition must obtain certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
-
The CBFC classifies films into four main categories:
📌 U: Approved for viewing by all age groups
📌 U/A (UA 7+, UA 13+, UA 16+): Suitable for children with parental supervision, with specific age-based advisories
📌 A: Restricted to adult audiences (18 years and above)
📌 S: Limited to specific professional groups such as scientists, engineers, or doctors
-
The certification process is governed by the Cinematograph Act, 1952, the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983, and additional guidelines issued by the central government under Section 5B of the Act.
-
Film certification is conducted by an Examining Committee set up by the Regional Officer of the CBFC. The committee reviews the film and provides its recommendations.
-
Certification decisions are made based on either a unanimous or majority opinion within the committee. If there’s a disagreement or a complex issue, it may be escalated to a Revising Committee or resolved by the CBFC Chairperson.
-
The CBFC also has the authority to refuse certification to a film. When filmmakers or producers disagree with CBFC’s verdict—either a certification or a rejection—they have the right to appeal. Previously, such appeals were handled by the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), which often overturned CBFC decisions. However, with the FCAT being dissolved in 2021, appeals must now be made directly to the High Courts.
-
Television programs and serials do not require CBFC certification. Instead, they must comply with the Content and Advertisement Codes outlined in the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995. As violations under this Act are non-cognizable, any legal action must be initiated through a formal complaint by a State Government–authorised officer
-
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) operates as a statutory authority under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, overseeing the public screening of films in accordance with the Cinematograph Act of 1952.
-
In India, films must receive CBFC certification before they can be released for public viewing.
-
As per the CBFC's official website, the board is composed of a Chairperson and various non-official members, all of whom are appointed by the Central Government. Its main office is located in Mumbai.
-
The CBFC maintains nine regional offices across the country, situated in Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Thiruvananthapuram, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Cuttack, and Guwahati. These offices are supported by Advisory Panels that assist in reviewing films. The Central Government nominates panel members from diverse professional backgrounds, and their tenure lasts for two years
Article 19(1) of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression to all citizens. However, this right is subject to reasonable limitations as outlined in Article 19(2), which allows for restrictions in specific circumstances.
Relevant laws governing media and content regulation include:
-
The Cinematograph Act, 1952
-
The Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024
-
Government-issued guidelines under Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act
-
The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, along with the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994, which include programming and advertising codes
-
The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act (COTPA), 2003 and associated Rules, 2004
-
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
-
The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950
-
The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971
-
The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act
-
The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
-
The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986
-
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, among others
-
The government has recently introduced a system of age-specific film certifications to encourage viewing that aligns with the viewer's age, especially for categories requiring parental supervision.
-
Through a gazette notification, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting amended the rules first issued in December 1991, which outline the criteria for approving films for public screening.
-
The updated rules empower the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to grant clearance for unrestricted public exhibition of films, while also indicating suitable age groups based on the film’s content.
-
As per the notification, content deemed appropriate for children aged 7 and above—but still requiring parental guidance for those under 7—will be rated as ‘U/A 7+’. Similarly, content suitable for children 13 and older but needing supervision for those below that age will receive a ‘U/A 13+’ rating. For children 16 and above, with guidance for younger viewers, the classification will be ‘U/A 16+’
For Prelims: Fundamental Rights, 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 86th Constitutional Amendment, Swaran Singh Committee, Article 51A, Verma Committee on Fundamental Duties of the Citizens (1999). |
Previous year Questions1. Which of the following statements is/are true of the Fundamental Duties of an Indian citizen? (UPSC 2017)
1. A legislative process has been provided to enforce these duties.
2. They are correlative to legal duties.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: D
2. Which of the following is/are among the Fundamental Duties of citizens laid down in the Indian Constitution? (UPSC 2012)
1. To preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
2. To protect the weaker sections from social injustice
3. To develop the scientific temper and spirit of inquiry
4. To strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
A. 1 and 2 only
B. 2 only
C. 1, 3, and 4 only
D. 1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer C
3. Under the Constitution of India, which one of the following is not a fundamental duty? (UPSC 2011)
A. To vote in public elections
B. To develop the scientific temper
C. To safeguard public property
D. To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals
Answer: A
|