• The NEP provides a broad direction and is not mandatory. Education is a concurrent subject, requiring collaboration between the central and state governments. The target for full implementation is set for 2040.
• Subject-wise committees, comprising members from relevant ministries at both levels, will develop implementation plans, outlining actions for various bodies, including the HRD Ministry, state Education Departments, and others. Progress will be jointly reviewed annually.

3. Impact on Mother Tongue/Regional Language Instruction

• While the NEP emphasizes teaching in the mother tongue or regional language "wherever possible," it is not mandatory for states.
• Private schools are unlikely to be forced to change their medium of instruction.
• The policy acknowledges multilingual families and encourages a bilingual approach for students whose home language differs from the medium of instruction.
• Single-stream institutions like IITs are already diversifying their offerings, including humanities and social sciences departments.
• This multidisciplinary approach aligns with global trends, ensuring graduates are well-rounded and equipped to address complex challenges.

4. NEP 2020 and Sustainable Development Goals

• Both the NEP 2020 and SDG 4 aim to provide inclusive and equitable quality education for all.
• They emphasize improving the quality of education, enhancing learning outcomes, and ensuring access to education at all levels.
• SDG 4.5 focuses on eliminating disparities in access to education and promoting inclusive education.
• The NEP 2020 also emphasizes inclusive education by addressing the needs of diverse groups, including marginalized communities, children with disabilities, and those in remote areas.
• Both the NEP 2020 and SDGs prioritize gender equality in education.
• They aim to eliminate gender-based discrimination in education and promote equal opportunities for girls and boys in schools and higher education.
• SDG 4.2 emphasizes the importance of early childhood education and care.
• The NEP 2020 incorporates a similar focus by introducing a 5+3+3+4 structure that includes early childhood education, aligning with the SDG's goal of ensuring that all children have access to quality pre-primary education.
• Both the NEP 2020 and SDG 4. c emphasize the importance of adequately trained and qualified teachers.
• They promote continuous professional development for educators to improve the quality of teaching and learning.
• SDG 4.6 promotes lifelong learning opportunities for all. The NEP 2020 recognizes the need for lifelong learning by introducing a four-year multidisciplinary undergraduate program with multiple exit options, encouraging continuous skill development.
• SDG 4.7 encourages global citizenship education and values for sustainability.
• While the NEP 2020 does not explicitly mention this goal, its emphasis on critical thinking, experiential learning, and holistic development aligns with the idea of nurturing responsible global citizens.
• SDG 17 calls for global partnerships to achieve the SDGs. The NEP 2020 acknowledges the importance of collaboration between various stakeholders, including governments, civil society, and international organizations, to implement education reforms effectively.
• Although the primary focus of the NEP is on education, it indirectly contributes to SDG 13 (Climate Action) and other environmental goals by promoting environmental awareness, sustainability education, and holistic development that includes a sense of responsibility towards the environment.

5. The salient features of NEP 2020

The salient features of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 include:

• The NEP 2020 proposes a new school curriculum that is more holistic and multidisciplinary. It also emphasizes the importance of early childhood education and foundational literacy and numeracy.
• The NEP 2020 proposes to open up the Indian higher education sector to foreign universities. This will allow students to access world-class education without having to leave India.
• The NEP 2020 proposes to discontinue the M Phil programme. This is in line with the global trend of moving towards a four-year undergraduate degree followed by a direct PhD programme.
• The NEP 2020 proposes to introduce multiple entry and exit options in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. This will give students more flexibility and allow them to tailor their education to their needs.
• The NEP 2020 emphasizes the importance of research and innovation in higher education. It proposes to increase funding for research and to create a more supportive environment for researchers.
• The NEP 2020 aims to internationalize the Indian education system. It proposes to increase student and faculty mobility and to collaborate with foreign universities.

6. Education policies in India and its fundamental objectives

• The primary objective of the first education policy was to promote social justice and reduce disparities in access to education.
• It aimed to provide free and compulsory education for all children up to the age of 14 (universalization of elementary education).
• The second education policy aimed to modernize and expand the education system while maintaining a focus on access and equity.
• It introduced the 10+2 structure of school education and emphasized vocational education and adult literacy.
• This revision of the 1986 policy focused on restructuring the curriculum and examination systems.
• It aimed to promote greater flexibility in course choices and reduce the emphasis on board exams.
• The NPE 2020 aims to transform the Indian education system to meet the demands of the 21st century.
• It emphasizes the universalization of early childhood education, a flexible and multidisciplinary approach to education, and the use of technology for learning.
• It also focuses on improving the quality of education, promoting research and innovation, and ensuring inclusivity and equity in education.
• India has also had various other policies and initiatives related to specific aspects of education, such as the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) for elementary education, the Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) for secondary education, and the Skill India initiative to promote vocational education and skill development.

7. Kothari Commission (1964–1966) recommendations to formulate a coherent education policy

• The Kothari Commission, officially known as the "Indian Education Commission" or the "Education Commission 1964-66," was a high-level commission appointed by the Government of India to review the state of education in the country and make recommendations for the development of education policies.
• The commission was chaired by Dr Daulat Singh Kothari, who was the Chairman of the University Grants Commission (UGC) at the time.
• The commission's recommendations played a significant role in shaping India's education policies in the decades that followed.

The key recommendations made by the Kothari Commission

• The commission emphasized the need to provide free and compulsory education for all children up to the age of 14.
• This recommendation laid the foundation for the goal of universalizing elementary education in India.
• The commission stressed the importance of improving the quality of education at all levels.
• It recommended measures to enhance the qualifications and training of teachers, revise curricula, and promote innovative teaching methods.
• The Kothari Commission recommended a flexible and broad-based curriculum that would cater to the diverse needs and interests of students.
• It emphasized the importance of holistic education and the inclusion of vocational education.
• The commission recognized the importance of teaching in the mother tongue or regional languages, especially at the primary level, to ensure better comprehension and retention among students. It recommended bilingual education where necessary.
• The commission called for a comprehensive and long-term educational plan to guide the development of education in India.
• It recommended the establishment of educational planning bodies at the national, state, and district levels.
• The Kothari Commission proposed the expansion and improvement of higher education in India.
• It recommended the establishment of new universities, including regional universities, and the development of research and postgraduate education.
•  The commission highlighted the need for quality teacher education programs and recommended the establishment of teacher training institutes to ensure a continuous supply of well-trained educators.
• Recognizing the importance of technical and vocational education for economic development, the commission recommended the expansion of such programs and the establishment of polytechnics and industrial training institutes.
• The commission suggested changes in the examination system to reduce the emphasis on rote learning and encourage critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
• The Kothari Commission emphasized the importance of addressing educational disparities among different social and economic groups.
• It recommended affirmative action policies to promote social justice in education.

8. NPE 1986 and NEP 2020 Compare and Contrast

The National Policy on Education (NPE) 1986 and the New Education Policy (NEP) 2020 are two important policy documents that have shaped the Indian education system. While both policies have some common goals, there are also some key differences between them.

Similarities

• Both policies aim to provide access to quality education for all children.
• Both policies emphasize the importance of equity and inclusion in education.
• Both policies stress the need for reforms in the examination system.
• Both policies recognize the importance of teacher training and professional development.

The key differences between the National Policy on Education (NPE) 1986 and the New Education Policy (NEP) 2020:

9. The National Curriculum Framework

The National Curriculum Framework (NCF) is a document in India that outlines the philosophy and guidelines for the development of curriculum and teaching practices in schools. It serves as a foundational document that informs the design, content, and implementation of school education in the country. 

• The NCF provides the philosophical and pedagogical foundation for education in India.
• It articulates the educational goals, values, and principles that should guide the curriculum and teaching practices.
•  The NCF encourages flexibility in curriculum development to accommodate diverse learners' needs and the evolving educational landscape.
• It recognizes that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable for India's diverse student population.
• The framework emphasizes holistic development, aiming to nurture not only cognitive skills but also social, emotional, and ethical aspects of a child's growth.
• It promotes a well-rounded education that goes beyond rote memorization.
• The NCF underscores the importance of inclusive education.
• It addresses the needs of students from various socio-economic backgrounds, genders, and abilities. It advocates for equal access to quality education for all.
• It encourages the integration of knowledge across subjects and promotes interdisciplinary learning.
• The framework encourages teachers to connect various subjects and topics to provide a more comprehensive educational experience.
• The NCF places the learner at the centre of the educational process. It emphasizes the importance of understanding students' interests, motivations, and individual learning styles.
• The framework recognizes the critical role of teachers in implementing curriculum effectively.
• It emphasizes the need for teacher professional development and continuous support.
• The NCF suggests assessment practices that move beyond traditional examinations and focus on formative assessments, encouraging a more comprehensive evaluation of a student's progress and capabilities.
• It promotes the inclusion of cultural and ethical values in education. The NCF encourages schools to foster an appreciation for India's diverse cultural heritage and ethical values.
•  The NCF is periodically reviewed and updated to ensure its continued relevance in the changing educational landscape.
• It takes into account advancements in education research and global best practices.

10. The Way Forward