UPSC Editorial

Back

General Studies 2 >> Governance

EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: The need to examine the examination system
The need to examine the examination system 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Source: The Hindu
 
 
For Prelims: Education System, Examination system
 
For Mains: General Studies II: The need to examine the examination system
 
 
 
 
Highlights of the Article
 
 
Examination Systems in India
Decentralized Examination Systems in India
Foundations of a Strong Assessment System
Strategic Steps for Strengthening Assessment Systems

 

 
 
Context
 

Exam season exposes scandals within universities and even school boards, eroding the very legitimacy of the certificates they issue. This lack of credibility ripples through the education system, warping priorities and undermining learning. Ideal teaching and learning equip students for any assessment, not just memorization drills. Current systems, however, often favour rote learning, tailoring instruction to anticipated exam formats. The education administration, obsessed with inflated grades and high pass rates, fuels this problem, ultimately burdening employers with the task of sifting through inflated credentials. A credible examination system is not just an ideal; it's the cornerstone of a vibrant and effective education system.

 
 
UPSC EXAM NOTES ANALYSIS:
 
 

1. Examination Systems in India

 

India, with its diverse education landscape, boasts a complex examination system that plays a pivotal role in assessing students' academic achievements. The examination structure in India is multifaceted, encompassing various levels of education from primary schools to higher education institutions.

Levels of Examination

  • Primary and Secondary Education: At the school level, students undergo examinations conducted by various educational boards, such as CBSE (Central Board of Secondary Education), ICSE (Indian Certificate of Secondary Education), and state boards. The 10th-grade examinations, often called board exams, are crucial and set the academic foundation for further studies.
  • Higher Secondary Education: The 12th-grade board examinations are critical for students aspiring to pursue higher education. These exams determine eligibility for admission to colleges and universities.
  • Higher Education: Universities and colleges conduct diverse examinations, including semester exams, annual exams, and entrance exams for professional courses. Competitive exams like JEE (Joint Entrance Examination) and NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) are gateway exams for engineering and medical courses.
 
 

2. Decentralized Examination Systems in India

 

India's vast higher education landscape comprises over 1,100 universities, 50,000 affiliated colleges (including 700 autonomous colleges), and a substantial enrollment of 40.15 million students. Additionally, there are 60 school boards overseeing secondary and higher secondary education, certifying over 15 million students annually. However, the decentralized nature of examination systems presents challenges and opportunities.

  • Challenges of Secrecy and Standardization: Secrecy and standardization are considered essential for good examination boards. However, unchecked secrecy can lead to scandals, emphasizing the need for proper checks, balances, and audits. Meanwhile, excessive standardization can stifle experimentation in assessment and curriculum. The true credibility of assessment and education standards, therefore, lies in transparency in teaching and assessment processes.
  • Concerns About Summative Examinations: Summative examinations in educational institutions aim to test and certify a student's learning. However, the current lack of validity over time and comparability across institutions raises concerns. The inconsistency in the examination system poses challenges, necessitating a reevaluation of its effectiveness.
  • Need for Comprehensive Testing: Traditionally, examinations were designed to assess a range of scholastic abilities, from memory recall to the application and creation of knowledge, and critical thinking. However, there are growing complaints that examination boards primarily test memory. This has led to a coaching culture where students focus on memorization rather than higher-order thinking skills.
  • Issues in Question Papers and Evaluation: Instances of flawed question papers with language errors, conceptualization issues, and irrelevant questions are not uncommon. Furthermore, the evaluation of answer scripts lacks discernment, often failing to reflect the differences in students' learning achievements. The current system falls short in certifying students on critical higher-order learning skills.
  • Impact on Employability and Rise of Coaching Culture: Employers increasingly disregard institutional certifications, opting for their own rigorous assessment of candidates' academic achievements and suitability for employment. This trend has given rise to a robust coaching market for competitive examinations and skilling, reflecting a lack of confidence in the current institutional examination system.

 

3. Foundations of a Strong Assessment System

 

Establishing a robust assessment system in educational institutions begins with the academic foundation of courses. While regulatory institutions in India emphasize outcome-based learning, the actual implementation often falls short due to a lack of regular and effective oversight. Curriculum design, pedagogy, and examination systems receive advisory guidelines, but inconsistencies and inadequacies persist in syllabi and classroom teaching.

  • Need for Transparent Oversight and Professional Involvement: To bridge the gap between advisory guidelines and actual implementation, a transparent oversight model and increased involvement of professional bodies in curriculum design and teaching are crucial. Waiting for curriculum changes to implement examination reforms is counterproductive; both processes should occur simultaneously.
  • Challenges of Secrecy in Assessment: Secrecy shrouds the entire examination process, from question paper setting to answer script evaluation and mark sheet preparation. This confidentiality, while intended to maintain standards, can become a breeding ground for mediocrity and potential scandals. Larger examination systems designed for uniformity are susceptible to malfunctioning and malpractices that undermine the intended standardization and confidentiality.
  • Autonomy and Oversight Dilemma: Regulatory bodies encourage colleges to pursue academic autonomy and conduct their own examinations. However, the conferred degrees/diplomas maintain parity with those from affiliating universities, limiting the impact of academic autonomy. Oversight authority for the affiliating university on the examination system of autonomous colleges is minimal, revealing a gap in the regulatory framework.
  • Transparency and Oversight as Key Elements: In a decentralized education system, where confidentiality and standardization have limited significance, ensuring a minimum standard becomes paramount. Transparency and effective oversight emerge as critical elements in examination systems to guarantee the maintenance of a minimum standard. The idea of standardization, especially in a decentralized context, appears challenging and requires a careful balancing act to address the diverse needs of educational institutions.

4. Strategic Steps for Strengthening Assessment Systems

 

  • Diverse Approaches to Achieve Minimum Standards: Defining minimum standards for learning outcomes opens avenues for diverse approaches. Academic experts contribute significantly to curriculum design, pedagogy, and assessment systems across various branches of knowledge. Research in teaching, subject-specific assessments, and skill-specific evaluations provide valuable insights. Continuous assessment, despite potential subjectivity, can benefit from real-time oversight and student participation in assessing teachers.
  • Leveraging Technology for Credibility: The incorporation of technology in assessment processes enhances credibility. Standardizing question paper content and evaluation procedures becomes feasible, ensuring checks and balances. Numerous software solutions in the market cater to both centralized and distributed assessment systems, offering a range of capabilities.
  • Codifying Quality Standards and Addressing Issues: Establishing codes for negligence, fraud, academic inadequacies, and other quality issues provides a framework for corrective measures and punishments. Transparency in the evaluation process, coupled with mechanisms for students to voice grievances, becomes crucial in maintaining quality standards.
  • External Audit for Accountability: External audits of assessment systems in universities and school boards become essential. These audits should cover all processes, adhering to principles and benchmarks established by educationists to ensure reliability and consistency. Grading examination boards based on transparency, reliability, and consistency should be integral to audit reports. The regular release of audit reports, preferably after major examination cycles, enhances accountability.
  • Expectations from Examination Boards: University degrees and school board certificates should genuinely reflect students' learning achievements. Examination boards play a pivotal role in assessing students comprehensively and challenging them appropriately. Grades should serve as meaningful distinctions based on academic attainments.
  • Balancing Confidentiality and Credibility: While confidentiality and consistency in grading with uniform standards are desired, transparency in the assessment process remains a real and critical feature. Adhering to at least the minimum acceptable standards ensures credibility in examination systems.
 
5. Conclusion
 
 
Rebuilding trust and confidence in India's examination system requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses the challenges of decentralization, promotes transparency and accountability, and fosters a culture of learning that prioritizes critical thinking and holistic development. By embracing these principles and working collaboratively, we can move towards a robust and credible assessment system that truly serves the needs of students, educators, and employers alike, ultimately strengthening the foundations of India's education system.
 
 
Mains Pratice Questions
 
1. Critically analyze the challenges posed by India's decentralized examination system to maintaining credibility and ensuring fair assessment. Suggest specific reforms to address these challenges.  (250 words)
2. What are the implications of the lack of trust in institutional certifications on employability and the rise of coaching culture in India? Discuss how can we revitalize the credibility of our examination system to bridge this gap. (250 words)
3. "A credible examination system is the cornerstone of a vibrant and effective education system." Discuss this statement in the context of India's educational landscape.  (250 words) 
4.  Discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with the use of technology in assessment. How can we ensure that technology is used effectively and ethically to improve the quality of education in India? (250 words)

Share to Social