APP Users: If unable to download, please re-install our APP.
Only logged in User can create notes
Only logged in User can create notes

General Studies 2 >> Polity

audio may take few seconds to load

SHAHI IDAGH-KRISHNA JANMABHOOMI DISPUTE
SHAHI IDAGH-KRISHNA JANMABHOOMI DISPUTE
 
 
 
 
1. Context 
 
 
The Shahi Idgah, a three-domed mosque in Mathura, will be surveyed following the decision of the Allahabad High Court which permitted an application seeking the appointment of a court commission to inspect the Shahi Idgah mosque that stands adjacent to the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura.
 

2. Judicial Order for Inspection

 

  • In a recent development, Justice Mayank Kumar has pronounced an order for the inspection of Shahi Idgah Jain. The directive emphasized the need to strictly maintain the sanctity of the campus during the execution of the commission.
  • A plea for a survey was submitted on behalf of the Hindu deity Shri Krishna and seven others. The original suit, currently pending before the court, asserts that the mosque was constructed over the birthplace of Shri Krishna, allegedly on the orders of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb in 1670.
  • Following the Babri Masjid judgment in 2019, a total of nine cases related to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah Masjid have been filed in the Mathura court, reflecting ongoing disputes and legal actions.
  • In a significant development earlier this year, the Allahabad High Court took a proactive step by transferring all suits pending before the Mathura Court to itself. These suits encompass various reliefs concerning the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute, consolidating the legal proceedings under its jurisdiction.

3. Masjid's Position in Legal Dispute

 

  • The U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board and the Shahi Idgah Masjid Committee, representing the mosque's interests, presented their arguments in the High Court.
  • They asserted that the Shahi Idgah Masjid is not situated within the specified 13.37 acres of land at Katra Keshav Dev.
  • Additionally, they contended that there is no factual basis supporting the plaintiffs' claim that the birthplace of Lord Krishna is beneath the mosque.
  • According to them, the plaintiffs' assertions are mere guesswork and lack substantiation through any documentary evidence.
  • When the Committee of Management Trust of the Shahi Idgah Masjid sought a stay on the survey by approaching the Supreme Court, the apex court declined to provide relief.
  • Justice Sanjiv Khanna, presiding over a two-judge Bench, informed the mosque's advocate Huzefa Ahmadi that no stay would be granted at that stage.
  • The court encouraged the continuation of the survey process, with the option for the mosque to challenge any adverse order in the future.

 

4. What does the Places of Worship Act say? 

 

  • As the survey's details are being finalized, the mosque committee is citing the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. According to this act, changing the character of any place of worship as it existed on August 15, 1947, is prohibited. The committee asserts that this legislation safeguards the status quo of religious places.
  • In 2020, the Vishwa Bhadra Pujari Purohit Mahasangh from Lucknow filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging Section 4 of the 1991 Act. The petition argued that the Act infringes upon the rights of Hindus to protect their religious properties against encroachment by followers of another faith. The objective was to declare Section 4 as ultra vires.
  • The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind countered the legal challenge by asserting that the Places of Worship Act prohibits the conversion of any place of worship, and its provisions are forward-looking. They argued that the Act aims to prevent future changes to the status of religious places and is consistent with the principles of secularism.
  • Referring to the M. Siddiq versus Suresh Das case, commonly known as the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi verdict, the Supreme Court upheld the significance of the Places of Worship Act. The court emphasized that the Act imposes a non-derogable obligation to enforce the commitment to secularism as outlined in the Constitution.
 
 

5. Historical Background of the Land

 

  • The current survey stems from the Hindu representatives' demand for complete ownership of the land where the Keshava Deva temple once stood. The temple, initially built in 1618 during the reign of Jahangir by Bir Singh Bundela, was later destroyed on the orders of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb in 1670. Interestingly, the temple had received patronage from Aurangzeb's brother and rival, Dara Shukoh.
  • In 1815, Raja Patni Mal of Benaras purchased the 13.77-acre land from the East India Company. Subsequently, his descendants sold the land to Jugal Kishore Birla for ₹13,400. Jugal Kishore Birla established the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust, gaining ownership rights over the temple and the land.
  • In 1951, the 13.77-acre land was officially placed under the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust. A critical condition was imposed on the trust, ensuring that the trust property would never be sold or pledged.
  • In 1968, an agreement was forged between the Sri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sangh and the Shahi Idgah Masjid Trust. As part of this settlement, the temple authority conceded a portion of the land to the Idgah. The agreement established a historical arrangement between the temple and the mosque. However, the current dispute arises as the temple petitioners now seek possession of the entire parcel of land, leading to the survey and legal proceedings.
 
 
For Prelims: Shahi Idgah mosque, Krishna Janmabhoomi temple, Babri Masjid judgment, the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991
For Mains: 
1. Discuss the role of the judiciary in resolving religious disputes in India. To what extent can the legal system balance the competing claims of different communities while upholding the principles of secularism and justice? (250 Words)
 
 
Previous Year Questions
 
1. The dispute relating to the Babri Masjid/Ramjanambhoomi before the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) is in the nature of a (45th BPSC Prelims 2002)
A. Writ Petition        B. Title Suit   C. Claim for Compensation        D. Judicial Review Petition 
 

2. Consider the following statements: (upsc 2020)

  1. The Constitution of India defines its ‘basic structure’ in terms of federalism, secularism, fundamental rights and democracy.
  2. The Constitution of India provides for ‘judicial review’ to safeguard the citizens’ liberties and to preserve the ideals on which the Constitution is based.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only   (b) 2 only      (c) Both 1 and 2            (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answers: 1-B, 2-D

Mains
 
1. What are the challenges to our cultural practices in the name of Secularism? (upsc 2019)
2. How the Indian concept of secularism is different from the Western model of secularism? Discuss. (upsc 2018)
 
Source: The Hindu 
 

Share to Social