STATEMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Back

STATEMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS

 
 

Reasoning based on Statements and Conclusions is a pivotal component of Analytical Reasoning. This section involves presenting passages or statements followed by conclusions, and candidates are required to make decisions based on the provided information, selecting the accurate conclusion from the options given. In this context, a conclusion signifies a fact that can be logically deduced from the provided statement.

This segment is of utmost importance in various government examinations, given its prevalence across different question types in analytical reasoning. Consequently, it holds a significant place as one of the critical sections under analytical reasoning. This article aims to explore the fundamental concepts of the Statement and Conclusion logical reasoning section. It includes detailed explanations of key ideas, accompanied by solved examples, practice questions, helpful tips, and strategies. A comprehensive reading of the article will assist in resolving any uncertainties related to this topic

 

What is Statement and Conclusion Reasoning?

 

Statement and Conclusion Reasoning is a type of logical reasoning where you are provided with a statement or a set of statements, and your task is to evaluate conclusions drawn from those statements. The goal is to determine whether the conclusions logically follow from the given statements.

Here's a breakdown of the key components:

  1. Statement(s):

    • A statement is a proposition or assertion that provides information, facts, or opinions about a particular subject. In Statement and Conclusion Reasoning, one or more statements are presented as the basis for drawing conclusions.
  2. Conclusion(s):

    • A conclusion is a statement that is inferred or logically derived from the information provided in the statements. It represents the logical outcome or result based on the given premises.

The primary objective of Statement and Conclusion Reasoning is to assess the validity of the conclusions in relation to the provided statements. You need to analyze whether the conclusions logically flow from the information given and whether they can be considered a direct result or implication of the statements

 

Types of Statement and Conclusion

 

The primary objective of Statement and Conclusion Reasoning is to assess the validity of the conclusions in relation to the provided statements. You need to analyze whether the conclusions logically flow from the information given and whether they can be considered a direct result or implication of the statements.

Key points to consider when dealing with Statement and Conclusion Reasoning:

  • Logical Inference:

    • Evaluate whether the conclusions can be logically inferred from the statements. In other words, determine if the conclusions follow logically and naturally from the information provided.
  • Relevance:

    • Assess the relevance of each conclusion to the statements. Conclusions should be directly related to the information presented and not introduce new elements.
  • Complete Understanding:

    • Ensure that you have a complete understanding of the statements before evaluating the conclusions. Misinterpreting the statements can lead to incorrect assessments.
  • Negation Test:

    • Sometimes, negating a conclusion (assuming it to be false) and checking if it contradicts the given statements can be a useful technique for evaluation.
  • Multiple Conclusions:

    • Be prepared for scenarios where multiple conclusions are presented. Each conclusion should be assessed independently for its validity.
  • No New Information:

    • Conclusions should not introduce new information that is not present in the given statements. They should be based solely on the information provided.
 
 

 

Solved Sample Questions on Statement and Conclusion

 

Example 1: Statement: "All mammals have a backbone."

Conclusions:

  1. Humans have a backbone.
  2. Snakes are mammals.

Solution:

  1. Conclusion 1 (Valid): The statement asserts that all mammals have a backbone, and humans are mammals. Therefore, it logically follows that humans have a backbone.

  2. Conclusion 2 (Invalid): The statement does not claim that all animals with backbones are mammals. Snakes are reptiles, not mammals, so the conclusion is not logically inferred from the given statement.

Conclusion: Conclusion 1 is valid, but Conclusion 2 is invalid.

 

Example 2: Statement: "If it rains, the match will be canceled."

Conclusions:

  1. The match is canceled.
  2. It is raining.

Solution:

  1. Conclusion 1 (Valid): The statement explicitly states that if it rains, the match will be canceled. Therefore, if the match is canceled, it indicates that it is raining.

  2. Conclusion 2 (Not Necessarily Valid): The statement does not provide information about the match being canceled for reasons other than rain. Therefore, the conclusion that it is currently raining cannot be solely based on the statement.

Conclusion: Conclusion 1 is valid, but Conclusion 2 is not necessarily valid.


Share to Social