STATEMENTS AND ARGUMENTS

Back

STATEMENTS AND ARGUMENTS

 
 

In the Logical Reasoning segment dedicated to Statements and Arguments, an argument refers to a statement or a sequence of statements that presents a particular perspective, articulating diverse opinions in favor of or against a specific matter. Arguments play a vital role in analytical reasoning, as various question types within analytical reasoning, such as inferences, assumptions, course of action, syllogism, etc., are intricately linked to the concept of argumentation. This is why arguments are often referred to as the fundamental foundation of analytical reasoning.

This article aims to delve into the fundamental concepts of the Statement and Argument reasoning section. It will include explanations of key ideas, along with solved examples, practice questions, helpful tips and tricks, and additional insights. It is recommended to thoroughly read the article to resolve any uncertainties related to this topic

 

What is Statement and Argument Reasoning?
 

Statement and Argument Reasoning is a type of logical reasoning where you are presented with a statement or a series of statements followed by an argument. Your task is to evaluate the argument in relation to the given statement(s) and determine its validity or strength.

Here's a breakdown of the key components:

  1. Statement(s):

    • A statement is a proposition or assertion that presents information, facts, or opinions about a particular subject. In Statement and Argument Reasoning, one or more statements are provided as the basis for the argument.
  2. Argument:

    • An argument is a statement or a series of statements that put forth a specific point of view or perspective regarding the information presented in the statement(s). It expresses opinions, reasoning, or evidence in support of or against the statement(s).

The goal of Statement and Argument Reasoning is to assess the logical coherence, validity, and strength of the argument in relation to the given statement(s). You need to analyze the argument critically and determine whether it provides convincing support or justification for the statement(s).

When analyzing arguments, consider the following aspects:

  • Relevance:

    • Assess whether the argument is directly related to the information presented in the statement(s). A relevant argument addresses the key points or issues raised in the statement(s).
  • Coherence:

    • Evaluate the logical consistency and clarity of the argument. A coherent argument presents ideas and reasoning in a clear, logical manner, without contradictions or fallacies.
  • Validity:

    • Determine whether the argument provides sufficient evidence, reasoning, or justification to support its conclusion. A valid argument is logically sound and persuasive.
  • Strength:

    • Consider the strength of the argument in providing convincing support for its conclusion. A strong argument presents compelling evidence or reasoning that makes its conclusion plausible or likely.
  • Counterarguments:

    • Anticipate and address potential counterarguments or objections to the argument. Assess how well the argument responds to opposing viewpoints or alternative interpretations.
 
Types of Statements and Arguments 
 
  • In Statement and Argument Reasoning, arguments can be categorized into different types based on their structure, purpose, or nature. Here are some common types of arguments:
  • Inductive arguments are based on specific observations or evidence and draw general conclusions. These arguments aim to make the conclusion probable rather than certain
  • Deductive arguments start with general premises and derive specific conclusions. If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Deductive reasoning is often associated with formal logic
  • Conditional arguments involve statements that establish a relationship between conditions or factors. They often use "if...then" statements to convey the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion
  • Causal arguments assert a cause-and-effect relationship between two or more events or phenomena. They suggest that one event leads to or results in another
  • Analogical arguments draw comparisons between two or more situations, asserting that if they are similar in certain respects, they are likely to be similar in other respects as well
  • Moral arguments involve considerations of ethics, values, or morality. They present viewpoints based on what is considered right or wrong, good or bad
  • Statistical arguments rely on numerical data or statistical evidence to support the conclusion. They often involve percentages, averages, or other quantitative measures
  • A priori arguments are based on reasoning and deductive logic rather than empirical evidence or experience. They derive conclusions from inherent truths or principles
  • A posteriori arguments rely on empirical evidence and observations. Conclusions are drawn based on real-world experiences and facts
  • Prescriptive arguments propose a course of action or advocate for a specific solution to a problem. They focus on what should be done or what is recommended
  • Descriptive arguments aim to describe or explain a situation, event, or phenomenon. They provide information without necessarily advocating a particular viewpoint
 
 
Solved examples of Statements and Argument

 

Example 1: Statement: "All students who scored above 90% in the final exam are eligible for the advanced mathematics class."

Argument: "Tom should be allowed to join the advanced mathematics class because he scored 95% in the final exam."

Solution:

  • Evaluation:

    • The argument suggests that Tom should be allowed to join the advanced mathematics class because he meets the criteria stated in the statement. The argument is logically sound, and the conclusion is directly supported by the given statement.
  • Conclusion:

    • The argument is valid and strong. Tom's score of 95% aligns with the criteria set in the statement.
 
Example 2: Statement: "The new policy of allowing employees to work remotely has increased overall productivity."
Argument: "Since the implementation of the remote work policy, there has been a decrease in face-to-face collaboration, so it must be negatively impacting teamwork and innovation."

 

Solution:

  • Evaluation:

    • The argument presents a viewpoint that the remote work policy is negatively impacting teamwork and innovation due to a decrease in face-to-face collaboration. However, the statement only mentions increased overall productivity without specifying its impact on collaboration or innovation.
  • Conclusion:

    • The argument is weak as it introduces an assumption (negative impact on teamwork and innovation) not explicitly supported by the given statement. A more direct link between the argument and the statement is needed for it to be stronger.

Share to Social