POCSO ACT
1. Context
2. Development of Legislation Against Child Sexual Abuse in India
- The Constitution of India includes provisions to protect children's rights.
- India has ratified international instruments like the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Protocol on the Sale of Children.
- India lacked specific legislation addressing child sexual abuse.
- Cases were tried under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, which were deemed insufficient.
- A child sexual abuse racket was exposed in Goa during the 1990s.
- The state government responded by enacting a law in 2003 to promote child rights.
- The Special Expert Committee under Justice VR Krishna Iyer drafted the Children's Code Bill, presenting a comprehensive framework for child rights in India.
- In 2005, the Department of Women and Child Development prepared a draft bill to address different offenses targeted against children.
- Published by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.
- Covered 13 states with a sample size of 12,447 children, 2,324 young adults, and 2,449 stakeholders.
- Found that 50.76% of children surveyed reported experiencing one or more forms of sexual abuse.
- Boys reported a higher overall percentage of sexual abuse than girls, contrary to prevailing perceptions.
- In September 2010, the Ministry of Women and Child Development prepared a draft bill.
- After several revisions, it came into force as the POCSO Act on Children's Day (November 14, 2012).
3. Analysis of POCSO Act Trials and Case Characteristics
- Acquittals and Convictions: Analysis shows that 43.44% of trials under the POCSO Act end in acquittals, while only 14.03% end in convictions. For every one conviction, there are three acquittals, indicating a significant disparity.
- State-wise Disparity in Acquittals and Convictions: Acquittals are significantly higher than convictions in all states studied. Examples: In Andhra Pradesh, acquittals are seven times more than convictions, and in West Bengal, acquittals are five times more than convictions. Kerala has a relatively lower gap, with acquittals constituting 20.5% and convictions constituting 16.49% of total disposals.
- Relationship Between Victim and Accused: Out of 138 examined judgments, only 6% of cases involved accused who were strangers to the victim. In 44% of cases, the relationship between the victim and accused was unidentified. Known acquaintances constituted 22.9% of the accused, family members accounted for 3.7%, and cases with prior romantic relationships made up 18%.
- Age Distribution of Victims and Accused: Among the 138 cases studied, 5.47% of victims were under 10 years, 17.8% were between 10-15 years, and 28% were between 15-18 years. The age of the victim was unidentified in 48% of cases. Age details of accused individuals were not identified in 63.6% of cases. Identified age ranges of accused: 11.6% between 19-25 years, 10.9% between 25-35 years, 6.1% between 35-45 years, and 6.8% above 45 years.
- Offenses and Severity: Penetrative sexual assault (31.18%) and aggravated penetrative sexual assault (25.59%) collectively account for over half of all POCSO cases. These offenses carry the most stringent punishments under the POCSO Act.
4. Analysis of POCSO Case Disposal and Pendency
- Delayed Disposal: On average, it takes 509.78 days for a POCSO case to be disposed of, exceeding the one-year stipulated timeframe under the Act.
- Increase in Pending Cases: The pendency of POCSO cases had been gradually increasing over the years. Notably, there was a sharp rise in pending cases between 2019 and 2020, attributed to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Reasons for Delay: Slow pace of police investigation and delays in depositing samples with Forensic Science Laboratories were identified as primary reasons for case delays.
- Transfers of Cases: 22.76% of cases were disposed of through transfers from one court to another. One-fifth of the cases in the dataset ended in transfers, indicating administrative mismanagement or wrongful appreciation of facts by the police.
- Increasing Transfer Trend: The percentage of transfers out of total disposals was around 8% in 2013 but rose to a little over 19% in 2019 and a concerning 42% in 2020. This trend is seen as problematic due to the time wasted as cases are transferred between courts.
5. POCSO Trials and Case Statistics in India
- Delhi's POCSO Trials and Case Length: Delhi has the highest number of POCSO trials in the country, with 13.54 cases per 100,000 population in 2018. However, Delhi also had the highest average case length in 2020, at 1,284.33 days.
- Average Time for Convictions: Chandigarh and West Bengal are the only states where the average time taken for convictions is within one year. States like Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Kerala, Sikkim, Chandigarh, and the NCT of Delhi have a higher reporting of POCSO cases.
- Districts with the Highest Number of POCSO Trials: The five districts with the highest number of POCSO trials (pending and disposed of) are Namchi (Sikkim), New Delhi, Central Delhi, Medak (Telangana), and West Garo Hills (Meghalaya).
- Pendency and Disposal Rates: Uttar Pradesh has the highest pendency, with 77.77% of the total POCSO cases filed between November 2012 and February 2021 pending. Tamil Nadu has the highest disposal percentage at 80.2%.
- Districts with Highest Pendency Percentages: The five districts with the highest pendency percentages include Lucknow, Hardoi, Budaun, and Allahabad in Uttar Pradesh and Howrah in West Bengal.
6. Gaps in Implementation
- Absence of Support Persons: According to the study, "support persons" are not appointed in most POCSO cases. The Supreme Court highlighted that in 96% of cases, victims were not provided with a support person.
- Role of support Persons: A support person can be an individual or organization working in child rights or protection, an official from a children's home or shelter home. or a staff member of the District Child Protection Unit (DCPU). Their role is to guide and support the victim throughout the legal process.
- Insufficient Designated POCSO Courts: The analysis reveals that not all districts have designated POCSO courts. As of 2022, 408 POCSO courts have been established in 28 states under the Government's Fast Track Special Court Scheme.
- Lack of Special Public Prosecutors: There is a shortage of special public prosecutors specifically appointed to handle POCSO cases. Even when appointed, they are often engaged in non-POCSO cases, leading to a lack of dedicated focus on POCSO matters.
For Prelims: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO), Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the Protocol on the Sale of Children, Children's Code Bill, 2000, Child Abuse Report (2007).
For Mains: 1. Critically analyze the findings of the analysis on convictions, acquittals, victim-accused relationships, and offense patterns in POCSO cases in India. (250 words).
|
Previous year Question
1. In India, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, ____ is a comprehensive law to provide for the protection of children from the offenses of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and pornography, while safeguarding the interests of the child. (SSC CGL 2021)
A.2012
B. 2006
C. 2010
D. 2008
Answer: A
|
ROOFTOP SOLAR SCHEME
The Rooftop Solar Scheme, also known as the PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana, is a government initiative in India that aims to promote the installation of solar panels on rooftops of residential buildings. The scheme's objectives include:
- The scheme aims to provide up to 300 units of free electricity per month to one crore (ten million) households.
- By generating their own solar power, households can reduce their dependence on the grid and save on electricity bills.
- Solar power is a clean and renewable energy source that helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change.
- The scheme aims to increase India's energy security and reduce its reliance on fossil fuels
Eligibility:
The scheme is open to all residential consumers in India. However, there may be specific requirements or limitations set by individual state governments. It's important to check with your local electricity distribution company (DISCOM) for detailed information on eligibility criteria and application procedures
What is India’s current solar capacity? India's current solar capacity is rapidly growing, making it difficult to give a precise real-time number. Here's what we know:
|
- India heavily relies on imported fossil fuels, making its energy security vulnerable to global market fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. By expanding solar energy, India can reduce its dependence on external energy sources and enhance its energy security
- India faces significant environmental challenges, including air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Solar energy is a clean and renewable resource, and its widespread adoption can help mitigate environmental degradation, reduce air pollution, and combat climate change.
- Solar energy contributes to diversifying the energy mix, reducing the country's dependence on finite fossil fuel resources. This diversification enhances resilience to energy price volatility and supply disruptions associated with fossil fuels.
- Millions of people in India still lack access to reliable electricity. Solar power, especially in decentralized or off-grid systems, can provide a cost-effective and sustainable solution to bring electricity to remote and underserved areas, thereby improving the quality of life and supporting economic development
- The solar energy sector has the potential to create jobs across various skill levels, from manufacturing and installation to maintenance and research. The expansion of the solar industry can contribute to employment generation and support the country's economic growth
- Solar projects can be deployed in rural areas, providing not only electricity but also opportunities for local economic development. Solar microgrids can power agricultural activities, improve healthcare services, and facilitate education in rural communities
- Investing in solar energy encourages research and development in renewable energy technologies. This innovation can lead to improvements in efficiency, storage, and overall performance, making solar energy more viable and competitive
- India has committed to international agreements and initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Expanding solar energy aligns with these global commitments, positioning India as a responsible and sustainable energy player on the international stage
- The cost of solar energy has been decreasing over the years, making it increasingly competitive with traditional sources of energy. As technology advances and economies of scale are realized, solar power becomes a cost-effective option for meeting India's growing energy demand
- Distributed solar power generation can enhance grid stability by reducing transmission and distribution losses and providing local sources of electricity. This decentralized approach can contribute to a more resilient and robust energy infrastructure
- The Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Rules, 2020 are a crucial piece of legislation in India that significantly empowers electricity consumers across the country
- A set of regulations introduced by the Indian Government to protect the rights of electricity consumers and ensure a high standard of service from distribution companies (DISCOMs).
- The rules provide a framework for consumer rights, obligations of distribution licensees, and mechanisms to address grievances
Key Rights Guaranteed by the Rules:
- Reliable Electricity Supply: Consumers have the right to 24x7 power supply, subject to reasonable technical constraints.
- New Connections: DISCOMs must provide new electricity connections within a specified timeline (7 days in metro cities, 15 days in municipal areas, 30 days in rural areas).
- Transparent Billing: Consumers have the right to receive accurate and timely bills with clear information on consumption and charges.
- Metering: Consumers have the right to have meters installed and tested regularly. They can also request meter testing if they have doubts about its accuracy.
- Grievance Redressal: The rules provide a clear mechanism for consumers to lodge complaints, with timelines for resolution by DISCOMs and consumer grievance redressal forums.
- Compensation: Consumers are entitled to compensation from DISCOMs for violations of service standards.
- Prosumers: The rules recognize the rights of "prosumers" – consumers who can generate their own electricity (like through rooftop solar) and feed excess back into the grid
- The amendments, announced on February 22, have relaxed regulations regarding the necessity of a technical feasibility report for rooftop solar projects. They also permit residential societies to choose between individual connections or a unified single-point connection through a democratic vote.
- Additionally, electricity distribution companies (DISCOMs) are now obligated to install an extra meter to address consumer complaints about inaccurate meter readings.
- Furthermore, these amendments have shortened the duration required for obtaining a new electricity connection and mandate DISCOMs to furnish a separate connection for an electric vehicle (EV) charging point upon consumer request. These modifications constitute the fourth amendment since the issuance of the 2020 notification.
- Previously, DISCOMs had to conduct a feasibility study for rooftop solar projects within 20 days of receiving an application and communicate the results to the applicant. A technical feasibility study assesses whether a property is financially and physically suitable for solar panel installation.
- The recent amendments have reduced this period to 15 days. Additionally, if the study is not concluded within this timeframe, it will be assumed that the proposal is technically feasible.
- In essence, the expenses associated with fortifying distribution infrastructure for rooftop solar projects with a capacity of up to 5 kilowatts will be covered by DISCOMs, and this can be offset through their operations.
- The power ministry highlighted in a press release, "Furthermore, it is now mandated that the distribution system strengthening required for rooftop solar PV systems up to 5 kW capacity will be undertaken by the distribution company at its own expense." Lastly, the interval between the installation and commissioning of rooftop solar projects has been reduced from 30 days to 15 days
For Prelims: Economic and Social Development
For Mains: General Studies III: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways etc
|
Previous Year Questions
1.Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2016)
1. The International Solar Alliance was launched at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2015.
2. The Alliance includes all the member countries of the United Nations.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 Only
B. 2 Only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 Nor 2
Answer (A)
|
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
1. Context
2. The Right to Information (RTI) Act:
- The Right to Information (RTI) Act is a landmark legislation enacted in India in 2005.
- It empowers citizens to access information held by public authorities and promotes transparency and accountability in government functioning.
Here are key points about the RTI Act:
Objective
Applicability
Information Disclosure
Request Process
- Citizens can file RTI applications in writing, seeking specific information. They need to pay a nominal fee with the application.
- Information must be provided within 30 days (or 48 hours for information concerning life and liberty), failing which authorities must explain the delay.
Exemptions
Public Interest Override
Promoting Accountability
- The RTI Act is a powerful tool for holding public officials accountable for their actions and decisions.
- It has been instrumental in exposing corruption, inefficiency, and human rights violations.
Challenges and Amendments:
Impact
- The RTI Act has empowered citizens to participate in governance, making the government more transparent and accountable.
- It has been hailed as a significant step toward strengthening democracy in India.
Role of Information Commissions
3. RTI Act Amendment:
- The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, of 2023, amended the RTI Act.
- It changed the prohibition on disclosing personal data from qualified to the total.
- NCPRI opposed this change, as it hinders social audits and may protect powerful officials.
- The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, of 2019, gave Union Government unilateral power over information commissioners' tenure and salaries.
- This raised concerns about their independence and effectiveness.
4. Undermining the RTI Act:
Dependence on Subordinate Rules:
- The RTI Act's effectiveness relies on subordinate rules set by Union and State Governments.
- States have autonomy in determining payment methods for RTI applications, causing disparities.
Payment Method Variations
- Inconsistencies exist in payment methods across states.
- Example: Tamil Nadu doesn't accept Indian Postal Orders (IPOs), a convenient payment method.
- Court fee stamps and demand drafts may be less accessible and burdensome alternatives.
Tardy Appointments to Information Commissions
- Delays in appointing members to Information Commissions, like the Central Information Commission (CIC) and State Information Commissions (SICs), erode confidence.
- Appeals can languish for months or years without resolution.
- Jharkhand SIC, for instance, lacked commissioners since May 2020, rendering the appeals process ineffective.
5. Online RTIs:
- Online RTI applications ease accessibility by eliminating the need for uncommon financial instruments.
- Payment via UPI simplifies the process.
- Many Indian states lack online RTI portals, limiting access for citizens.
- Even when available, some state government bodies may not be registered on these portals.
- The Union Government's RTI portal, launched in 2013, faces usability issues.
- Account creation, which streamlined the application process, has been removed.
- Users must now enter personal details for each application.
- Past applicant data has experienced glitches, with applications disappearing and later being restored.
6. Challenges and Dissatisfaction:
- Dissatisfaction with the RTI Act's effectiveness is increasing at a fundamental level.
- More first appeals are being filed, indicating public dissatisfaction with the information provided by public officials.
- The RTI Act faces structural problems related to institutions and websites.
- These issues hinder citizens' ability to conveniently access information and file requests.
- Activists highlight that the weakening of the RTI Act isn't limited to changes in the law's text.
- It stems from various government institutions' ways of discharging duties, narrowing avenues for information access, and understaffed appellate bodies.
For Prelims: Right to Information Act, 2005, Central Information Commission (CIC), State Information Commissions (SICs), Indian Postal Orders (IPOs), Digital Personal Data Protection Act, of 2023.
For Mains: 1. Examine the impact of recent amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Act on its core principles of transparency and accountability. How can the Act strike a balance between protecting sensitive information and ensuring citizens' access to government-held data?
|
Previous year Question1. Which of the following is related to the Right to Information Act, of 2005? (UPPSC 2015)
A. Lily Thomas v/s Union of India
B. Nandini Sundar v/s State of Chhattisgarh
C. Namit Sharma v/s Union of India
D. None of the above
Answer: C
|
Euthanasia
2. About Euthanasia
- Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person's life to relieve suffering.
- Euthanasia, which comes from the Greek words meaning “a good death”, refers to
- the practice under which an individual intentionally ends their life. Euthanasia
- falls under the category of assisted dying, which also includes assisted suicide.
- Assisted suicide is illegal under the terms of the Suicide Act (1961) and is punishable by up to 14 years imprisonment. Trying to kill yourself is not a criminal act.
- Depending on the circumstances, euthanasia is regarded as either manslaughter or murder. The maximum penalty is life imprisonment.
3. Types of euthanasia
Euthanasia can be classified as:
- voluntary euthanasia – where a person makes a conscious decision to die and asks for help to do so
- non-voluntary euthanasia – where a person is unable to give their consent (for example, because they're in a coma) and another person takes the decision on their behalf, perhaps because the ill person previously expressed a wish for their life to be ended in such circumstances
4. Historical context of Euthanasia
- Euthanasia was practised in both ancient Greece and Rome, wherein hemlock was employed as a means of hastening death.
- The term itself was used for the first time by philosopher Francis Bacon and expanded upon later by Karl Marx.
- Suicide and euthanasia become acceptable practices during the Age of Enlightenment in Europe and countries like Japan where suicide was used as a means to preserve a person’s honour and therefore not considered to be a sin.
- In Dying with Dignity (2015), Giza Lopes writes that in the mid-19th century, doctors regularly used morphine or chloroform to induce the death of patients who were terminally ill with no hope for recovery.
- The first attempt to legalise euthanasia took place in the United States in 1906, but the campaign was ultimately unsuccessful.
- In 1935, the movement regained steam in England with the formation of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legalisation Society.
- In 1936, King George V of England was given a fatal dose of morphine and cocaine to hasten his death, although this event was kept secret for another 50 years.
- In one of the more controversial examples of historic euthanasia, in 1939, Nazi Germany conducted the mass killing of mentally and physically impaired people and more than 300,000 died in the process.
- Later, during World War Two, British and American soldiers kept lethal pills on themselves to be used if they were captured or compromised.
- In a landmark announcement in 1957, the Vatican proclaimed that passive euthanasia was permissible under the church’s doctrine.
- This led to an increasing number of countries legalising either passive or active euthanasia over some time.
5. Legality of Euthanasia
- Active euthanasia is legal in only a handful of countries and necessitates
- deliberately using substances or forces to end the life of another person.
- Today, a handful of countries have legalised assisted dying in its various forms.
- In Switzerland, where assisted suicide is legal, around 1.5 per cent of Swiss deaths are the result of the practice.
- People also travel to Switzerland for assisted suicide, with statistics from 2018 indicating that around 221 people visited the country for it.
- Both euthanasia and assisted suicide are legal in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Belgium in cases where someone is experiencing unbearable suffering with no chance of improvement.
- There is no requirement to be terminally ill and the law even allows for people with mental illness to undergo the practice. In March 2021,
- Spain made it legal for people to end their lives in some circumstances and the same year, Canada expanded its law on assisted dying.
- Colombia is the first, and so far, only, Latin American country to decriminalize euthanasia.
- Several states in Australia also allow euthanasia with similar legislation
- enacted in New Zealand. Several states in America allow assisted dying with Oregon and Washington being the two most prominent. In India, passive euthanasia was legalised by the Supreme Court in 2018, as long as a person has a “living will” that specifies what actions should be taken if they are unable to make their own medical decisions in the future.
- If the person does not have a living will, their relatives are allowed to petition the high courts for permission to allow passive euthanasia.
- The moral debate surrounding assisted dying falls under the realm of bioethics.
6. Legality around Euthanasia
- Article 21 includes the right to die or not first came into consideration in the case State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Shripati Dubai.
- It was held in this case by the Bombay High Court that ‘right to life also includes ‘right to die’ and Section 309 was struck down.
- The court clearly said in this case that the right to die is not unnatural; it is just uncommon and abnormal. Also, the court mentioned many instances in which a person may want to end his life.
- This was upheld by the Supreme Court in the case P. Rathinam v. Union of India. However, in the case Gian Kaur v. the State of Punjab it was held by the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court that the “right to life” guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution does not include the “right to die”.
- The court mentioned in this case that Article 21 only guarantees the right to life and personal liberty and in no case can the right to die be included in it. In India, like almost in other countries, euthanasia has no legal aspect.
- Every act of aiding and abetting the commission of suicide is punished under section 306 of the I.P.C.
- Distinguishing euthanasia from suicide, Justice Lodha in Naresh Maratra Sakhee vs Union of India, observed that “suicide by its nature is an act of self-killing or self-destruction, an act of terminating one’s act and without the aid or assistance of any other human agency.
- “Mercy killing is nothing but homicide, whatever the circumstances in which it is affected. Unless it is specifically accepted it cannot be an offence. Indian Penal Code further punishes not only abetment of homicide but also abetment of suicide”.
7. The reasons encouraging Euthanasia
- End of Pain: Euthanasia provides a way to relieve the intolerably extreme pain and suffering of an individual. It relieves terminally ill people from a lingering death.
- Respecting Person's Choice: The essence of human life is to live a dignified life and to force the person to live in an undignified way is against the person’s choice. Thus, it expresses the choice of a person which is a fundamental principle.
- Treatment for others: In many developing and underdeveloped countries like India, there is a lack of funds. There is a shortage of hospital space. So, the energy of doctors and hospital beds can be used for those people whose lives can be saved instead of continuing the life of those who want to die.
- Dignified Death: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution provides for living with dignity. A person has a right to live a life with at least minimum dignity and if that standard is falling below that minimum level then a person should be given a right to end his life.
- Addressing Mental Agony: The motive behind this is to help rather than harm. It not only relieves the unbearable pain of a patient but also relieves the relatives of a patient from mental agony.
For Prelims: Indian Polity and Governance-Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc.
For Mains: GS-II, GS-IV: Government Policies and Interventions; Rights issue, Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants and consequences of Ethics in-human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics – in private and public relationships.
|
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION (NHRC)
- The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is a statutory body established in India in 1993 under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- It serves as an autonomous public institution tasked with the protection and promotion of human rights across the country.
- The NHRC investigates complaints of human rights violations, conducts inquiries, and recommends remedial action to the government.
- It also plays a role in promoting awareness of human rights and providing education on related issues.
- The commission consists of a chairperson and several members appointed by the President of India, and it operates at both the central and state levels
- The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was established in India on October 12, 1993, under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- This Act was enacted to fulfill the obligations India undertook by becoming a signatory to the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, which called for the establishment of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights.
- The NHRC was founded with the aim of addressing human rights violations and promoting awareness and respect for human rights across the country. It operates as an autonomous body, independent of the government, to ensure impartiality and effectiveness in its functioning.
- Since its inception, the NHRC has played a crucial role in investigating complaints of human rights violations, conducting inquiries, and making recommendations to the government for remedial action. It also engages in advocacy, education, and awareness programs to promote a culture of human rights in India.
- Over the years, the NHRC has evolved and expanded its scope to address various human rights issues, including those related to civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. It operates at both the central and state levels, with a chairperson and members appointed by the President of India.
- The NHRC's history is marked by its efforts to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and dignity enshrined in the Indian Constitution and international human rights instruments
The composition of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) includes a chairperson and several members appointed by the President of India. According to the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, the NHRC consists of:
-
Chairperson: The chairperson is appointed by the President of India and must be a retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or a serving or retired Judge of the Supreme Court.
-
Members: The NHRC can have up to four members, including a member who is or has been a Judge of the Supreme Court, a member who is or has been the Chief Justice of a High Court, and two other members who have knowledge or practical experience in matters relating to human rights.
These appointments aim to ensure the independence, expertise, and credibility of the NHRC in addressing human rights issues effectively. The members serve fixed terms as specified by the Act, and they collectively contribute to the commission's efforts to protect and promote human rights across the country
5.Appointment of NHRC Members
The appointment of members to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) follows a process outlined in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. Here's an overview of the appointment procedure:
-
Selection Committee: A Selection Committee is constituted to recommend candidates for appointment as Chairperson and members of the NHRC. The Selection Committee is chaired by the Prime Minister of India and includes the following members:
- The Speaker of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Deputy Speaker, in case the Speaker is unable to attend.
- The Minister in charge of the Ministry of Home Affairs in the Government of India.
- The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
- The Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) in the absence of the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha
- The NHRC is authorized to inquire into complaints of human rights violations received from individuals or groups. It can investigate violations committed by public servants or by any authority or person acting under the government's authority
- The Commission has the power to monitor human rights violations, including through suo moto action, where it can initiate an inquiry based on media reports, complaints, or its own knowledge
- Following investigations or inquiries, the NHRC can make recommendations to the concerned authorities for remedial action, prosecution, or compensation to victims of human rights violations
- The NHRC engages in activities to raise awareness about human rights issues through seminars, workshops, publications, and other educational programs
- It advises the government on policies and measures to promote and protect human rights effectively
- The NHRC can intervene in court proceedings related to human rights violations, either as a party or as amicus curiae (friend of the court)
- The Commission conducts research and studies on human rights issues to better understand the challenges and formulate appropriate responses
- Based on its findings and experiences, the NHRC can recommend legislative reforms to strengthen human rights protection in the country
- The NHRC collaborates with international human rights organizations and participates in international forums to promote human rights globally
- The NHRC has the authority to visit and monitor places of detention, such as prisons and juvenile homes, to ensure that inmates' human rights are respected
- The NHRC lacks direct enforcement authority. It can investigate human rights violations, make recommendations, and issue guidelines, but it cannot enforce its decisions or ensure their implementation. Its recommendations are non-binding, and compliance by government agencies or other authorities is voluntary.
- The process of investigation and resolution of complaints by the NHRC can be lengthy and time-consuming, leading to delays in providing justice to victims of human rights violations. This delay can undermine the effectiveness of the NHRC in addressing urgent and serious violations
- The NHRC operates with limited resources, including budgetary allocations and staffing. This constraint can affect its capacity to handle a large number of complaints effectively and conduct thorough investigations into human rights violations
- The NHRC's jurisdiction is limited to investigating human rights violations committed by public servants or authorities acting under the government's authority. It may not have jurisdiction over violations by non-state actors or in certain areas like the armed forces, where separate mechanisms exist
- There have been instances where political pressures or interference have affected the independence and impartiality of the NHRC. Political influence can hinder its ability to address human rights violations objectively and without bias
- Many people, especially in rural areas and marginalized communities, may not be aware of the NHRC's existence or how to access its services. This lack of awareness and accessibility can prevent victims of human rights violations from seeking redress through the commission
- Even when the NHRC makes recommendations for remedial action or compensation, there may be instances where these recommendations are not implemented fully or effectively by the concerned authorities
For Prelims: National Human Rights Commission
For Mains: Emerging Human Rights Challenges, Role and Functions of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
|
Previous Year Questions
1.Other than the Fundamental Rights, which of the following parts of the Constitution of India reflect/reflects the principles and provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)? (UPSC CSE 2020)
Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 and 2 only Answer: (d) 2.Consider the following: (UPSC CSE 2011)
Which of the above is/are Human Right/Human Rights under “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”? (a) 1 only Answer: (d)
1.Though the Human Rights Commissions have contributed immensely to the protection of human rights in India, yet they have failed to assert themselves against the mighty and powerful. Analysing theirstructural and practical limitations, suggest remedial measures. (UPSC CSE Mains GS 1 2021) |
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE (IBC)
1. Context
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to celebrate its Eighth Annual Day tomorrow Winners of the 5th National Online Quiz on IBC to be felicitated with a merit certificate, medal, and cash prize on the occasion
2. About Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
2.1.Insolvency: Insolvency is a situation where individuals or companies cannot repay their debt.
2.2.Bankruptcy: It is a situation whereby a court of competent jurisdiction has declared a person or other entity insolvent, having passed appropriate orders to resolve it and protect the rights of the creditors.
IBC was introduced in 2016 to consolidate previously available laws to create a time-bound mechanism with a creditor-in-control model as opposed to the debtor-in-possession system. When insolvency is triggered under the IBC, there can be just two outcomes: Resolution or Liquidation, with the former being the preferred solution.
Companies have to complete the entire insolvency exercise within 180 days under IBC and the deadline may be extended if the creditors do not raise objections to the extension.
3. CHALLENGES FOR THE IBC:
- Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India is the regulator of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in India. According to its regulator, IBBI the first objective of the IBC is a resolution-finding way to save a business through restructuring, change in ownership, mergers, etc.
- The second objective is to maximize the value of assets of the corporate debtor; the third objective is to promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit, and balancing of interests.
- According to Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India data for the 3400 cases admitted under the IBC in the last six years, more than 50% of the cases ended in liquidation, and only 14% could find a proper resolution.
- The IBC was thus initially given a 180-day deadline to complete the resolution process, with a permitted 90-day extension. It was later amended to make the total timeline for completion 330 days which is almost a year.
- However, in the financial year 2022, it took 772 days to resolve cases involving companies that owed more than 1000 crores. The average number of days it took to resolve such cases increased rapidly over the past five years.
4. IBC 2016 Advantages
Strict timelines:
- Normal cases: 180 days
- Complex cases: 180 days +90 days
- Legal proceedings: 330 days
- In the case of tardy legal proceedings, it can go beyond 330 days.
- It promotes entrepreneurship, the release of capital that can be invested in other productive assets.
- It focuses more on resolution rather than liquidation.
- In only 15% of cases, the resolution is done, and the rest is liquidation.
5. Expert’s opinion on IBC:
- In order to address the delays, the parliamentary standing committee suggested that the time taken to admit the insolvency application and transfer control of the company to a resolution process, should not be more than 30 days after filing.
- The IBBI has also called for a new yardstick to measure haircuts. It suggested that haircuts cannot be looked at as the difference between the creditors’ claims and the actual almost realized but as the difference between what the companies bring along when it enters IBC and the value realized.
6. INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2021
- The insolvency and bankruptcy code (Amendment) Bill, 2021 was introduced in the Lok-Sabha to amend the insolvency law and provide for a pre-packaged resolution process for stressed Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises.
- Under this mechanism, main stakeholders such as creditors and shareholders come together to identify a prospective buyer and negotiate instead of a public bidding process.
- The insolvency and bankruptcy are applicable to defaults which is more than Rs.1crore. There has been a recent change in IBC, which is called the Pre-Pack mechanism for MSMEs.
6.1 Pre-Pack Mechanism:
- If an MSME takes a loan and the default is less than 1 crore, then this Pre-Pack mechanism will be applicable.
- Under this mechanism, the owner of the MSMEs will propose or submit a resolution plan to NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal). Outside bidders and open bidding will not be done.
- During this resolution, the management of MSMEs will remain with the previous owners. Under this mechanism, the process will be completed within 120 days.
7. CONCLUSION:
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has reformed the Indian Insolvency Law to a great extent. The government needs to provide appropriate budgetary allocations to up skilling insolvency professionals and digitization of insolvency resolution process.
There has been a marked improvement in the recovery process which is already leading to billions of dollars being invested in the country due to the protection of creditor rights.
Prelims question: 1. According to the IBC, which of the following is not a financial service
A.Underwriting issuance of financial support
B.Accepting of deposits
C.Operating an investment scheme
D.Payment of wages to the Employees
Mains questions:
|
Source: The Hindu