UPSC Editorial

Back

General Studies 1 >> Modern Indian History

EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: National Unity, a three dimensional view

National Unity, a three-dimensional view

 
Source: The Hindu
For Prelims: Mahatma Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar, Caste Reservation System
For Mains: National unity from a three-dimensional perspective, Conflict of Ambedkar and Gandhi over Caste
 
Highlights of the Article
Poona Pact
Communal Award in 1932
National Unity
Caste Reservation
Hindu-Muslim Unity
 
Context:
India’s national unity evolved over more than a century, through political and social movements and legal and constitutional designs. This involved intense battles and wise compromises among constituent groups. The national identity thus constituted developed along three dimensions.
 
UPSC EXAM NOTES ANALYSIS
 
1. Gandhi's view on the Caste system in Hindu religion
  • M.K. Gandhi was the primary spokesperson of the first two axes Hindu unity and Hindu-Muslim unity. He declared himself a Hindu when that category was still contested
  • “I find peace in the Hindu religion… I studied other religions also, and I decided that whatever its defects and drawbacks, Hinduism alone could be the religion for me. That is what I feel and that is why I call myself a Sanatani Hindu,”- Mahatma Gandhi
  • Gandhi attempted to interpret Hinduism in an increasingly inclusive manner. He insisted on its legitimacy as a historical category independent of the subcontinent’s encounter with colonialism and other religious traditions. 
  • Mahatma Gandhi was an outspoken critic of the caste system in India. He believed that it was a harmful and unjust system that divided people and prevented them from living in harmony
  • Gandhi believed that the caste system was not part of true Hinduism. He argued that the Vedas, the oldest Hindu scriptures, do not teach the idea of caste. He also pointed out that there are many different castes in Hinduism, and that they have changed over time. This suggests that the caste system is a social construct, not a religious one
  • Gandhi believed that the caste system was harmful because it created social inequality and injustice. He argued that it prevented people from rising to their full potential, and that it led to discrimination and violence.
  • Gandhi also believed that the caste system was incompatible with his vision of a united and independent India. He argued that a caste-ridden society could not be a truly free and democratic one
  • Gandhi's views on the caste system were not universally shared. Many Hindus, including some of his own followers, disagreed with him. However, Gandhi's criticisms of the caste system helped to raise awareness of the issue and to challenge its legitimacy
  • Gandhi distinguished between the ancient Varna system and the more rigid caste system that had developed over centuries. He argued that the Varna system, which categorized people based on their professions and skills, had a more flexible and less discriminatory character. However, he acknowledged that the caste system had distorted the Varna system and created a hierarchy of discrimination.
 
2. Ambedkar on the Caste System
 
B.R. Ambedkar, a prominent Indian jurist, social reformer, and the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, had deeply insightful and critical views on the caste system in India. He dedicated his life to advocating for the rights and dignity of marginalized and oppressed communities, particularly the Dalits (formerly known as "untouchables")
 
Ambedkar Views on Caste:
  • Annihilation of Caste: Ambedkar famously called for the "annihilation of caste." He believed that the caste system was not just a social hierarchy but a deeply entrenched form of social discrimination and oppression. He argued that caste divisions violated the principles of equality, justice, and human dignity
  • Ambedkar was a staunch advocate for the social and political equality of all individuals, regardless of their caste or social background. He argued that true democracy could only be achieved when caste-based discrimination and untouchability were completely eradicated
  • Ambedkar saw the conversion of Dalits to Buddhism as a means of escaping the caste system's shackles.
  • In 1956, he led a mass conversion ceremony in Nagpur, where he and thousands of his followers converted to Buddhism. He believed that Buddhism's teachings, which promoted equality and non-discrimination, were more in line with his vision for a just society.
  • Ambedkar played a pivotal role in the inclusion of provisions for reservation (affirmative action) for Scheduled Castes (Dalits) in the Indian Constitution. He argued that such measures were necessary to uplift marginalized communities and provide them with opportunities for education and employment.
3. Conflict between Gandhi and Ambedkar
 
Subject Gandhi Views Ambedkar Views
Approach to Caste
Gandhi and Ambedkar had contrasting approaches to addressing the caste system. Gandhi believed in reforming the existing Hindu society from within and was optimistic about the possibility of reforming the caste system through non-violent means.
He advocated for inter-caste harmony and encouraged upper-caste Hindus to uplift the lower castes voluntarily
Ambedkar, on the other hand, was skeptical of the ability to reform the caste system and believed that it needed to be annihilated. He saw conversion to Buddhism as a way for Dalits to escape the caste system
Temple Entry Movements Gandhi supported the idea of opening temples to Dalits and believed in the need for voluntary reform within Hinduism. He undertook hunger strikes to protest against the denial of temple entry to Dalits Ambedkar, while appreciating these efforts, believed that temple entry was a superficial issue and that the deeper problem of caste discrimination required more comprehensive solutions
Separate Electorates Gandhi vehemently opposed this idea, fearing that it would further divide Indian society along caste lines. This disagreement led to the Poona Pact of 1932 At one point, Ambedkar advocated for separate electorates for Dalits, which would have given them a separate political representation
Conversion to Buddhism Ambedkar's decision to convert to Buddhism in 1956, along with thousands of his followers, marked a significant break from Hinduism. He saw Buddhism as a religion that rejected the caste system and provided a path to equality Gandhi was supportive of Ambedkar's right to choose his religion but expressed sadness over the conversion, as he believed in the possibility of reform within Hinduism
 
 
4. Poona Pact
  • In 1932, as part of the British Government of India Act (1935) discussions, there was a provision for separate electorates for Dalits.
  • This meant that Dalits would have a separate electorate, and candidates for Dalit seats would be elected only by Dalit voters.
  • This proposal was aimed at providing political representation to the marginalized Dalit community but was also controversial, as it was seen by some as a move that would further divide Indian society along caste lines.
  • B.R. Ambedkar, a prominent Dalit leader, supported the idea of separate electorates, as he believed it would give Dalits a distinct political voice and protect their interests. He saw this as a way to secure political power for the oppressed Dalits
  • Mahatma Gandhi, however, strongly opposed the idea of separate electorates. He believed that such a division of society based on caste would hinder the broader goal of Hindu unity and social harmony. Gandhi feared that it would perpetuate caste divisions and weaken the fight against untouchability and caste discrimination.
  • The Poona Pact, also known as the Yerwada Pact, was an agreement reached between Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar on September 24, 1932, in the city of Pune (Poona), India. This agreement was a significant development in Indian politics and played a crucial role in shaping the political representation of Dalits (Scheduled Castes) in India
Details of the Pact:

To resolve this contentious issue, a series of negotiations and discussions took place between Gandhi and Ambedkar. Ultimately, they reached an agreement known as the Poona Pact. The key elements of the Poona Pact were as follows:

  1. Reserved Seats: Instead of separate electorates, the Poona Pact agreed to have reserved seats for Dalits (Scheduled Castes) within the general electorate. In other words, Dalits would vote in the general elections along with the rest of the population, but a certain number of seats would be set aside for Dalit candidates. This was seen as a compromise between the two leaders.

  2. Weighted Representation: The number of reserved seats for Dalits would be determined based on the proportion of the Dalit population in a particular province or region. This meant that the greater the Dalit population in an area, the more reserved seats there would be.

  3. Joint Electorates: The Poona Pact also called for joint electorates, meaning that all voters, regardless of caste, would vote together in the same elections. There would be no separate electorates for any community.

5.Conclusion
The need for unity among Indians, irrespective of castes, is essential for several reasons, and it has been a foundational principle in the country's struggle for independence and its subsequent development as a democratic nation
India is an incredibly diverse country with a multitude of languages, religions, and cultures. Embracing this diversity and fostering unity across castes and communities enhances the strength and resilience of the nation. Unity allows India to draw on the collective wisdom, skills, and perspectives of its diverse population to address various challenges and opportunities.
 
 
Practice Mains Questions
 
1.Describe the background and significance of the Poona Pact of 1932. How did it impact the political representation of Dalits in India?
2.Discuss the key differences in the approaches of Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar towards addressing the issue of caste discrimination in India. How did these differences shape their respective strategies for social reform?
3.Explain the role of Mahatma Gandhi and B.R. Ambedkar in the negotiation and resolution of the issue of separate electorates for Dalits in the lead-up to the Poona Pact. How did their differing perspectives influence the final agreement?

Share to Social