SAFE HARBOUR
1. Context
In written submissions to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communication and Information Technology, the Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said that it is reconsidering the concept of safe harbour for social media platforms, to combat the issue of “fake news” online
2. What is Safe Harbour?
- The concept of safe harbour in law offers legal protection to websites that host user-generated content, shielding them from liability for unlawful material posted by third parties.
- Introduced during the early development of the internet, it was designed to foster online innovation and prevent platform operators from being held accountable for content they neither created nor controlled.
- This legal area is often referred to as intermediary liability, where safe harbour acts as a safeguard, generally exempting platforms from criminal responsibility for third-party content they host.
- In the United States, these protections are embedded in Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was amended in 1996 to include these provisions. India has a comparable legal framework in Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which similarly grants immunity to intermediaries under certain conditions.
- However, these protections are conditional. Under Indian law, if an intermediary is made aware of illegal content—interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean either a court directive or official government notice—they must act promptly to remove it. Failing to do so results in the loss of their legal shield under Section 79.
- Without the backing of safe harbour laws, digital platforms could face severe repercussions for content uploaded by users. A notable example occurred in 2004, when the head of eBay India was arrested after a user listed a disk containing child sexual abuse material for sale on the site
3. Intermediary liability protections
- Although safe harbour comes with certain conditions, the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 introduced further requirements for digital platforms to maintain their protection from intermediary liability.
- Under these rules, social media companies must appoint both a nodal contact person and a grievance officer based in India. They are also obligated to regularly publish transparency reports detailing user complaints and the actions taken in response.
- Several aspects of the IT Rules have faced legal challenges over the past few years. For instance, in 2023, the government introduced amendments to the rules, granting the Press Information Bureau’s fact-checking unit the authority to label content as “fake news.”
- Under this provision, platforms could lose their safe harbour status if they failed to take down such flagged content.
- This amendment was quickly contested in court, notably by comedian Kunal Kamra, who filed a petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioners argued that the government had overstepped its mandate by empowering a fact-checking body to act as a judge of truth, thereby pressuring social media platforms to remove content without issuing formal notices to users.
- The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of Kamra, though the government has appealed the decision
4. Amending the safe harbour clause
- The Indian government has criticized international social media companies for allegedly violating local regulations and responding too slowly to content removal requests. Prior to Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter (now called X), the platform frequently clashed with the central government over directives to restrict access to certain user content.
- Even under Musk’s ownership, X has continued to challenge the government's authority to block or remove content without informing users, taking the matter to the Karnataka High Court.
- In its efforts to push for stricter platform accountability, the Union government has proposed revisions to the safe harbour framework, aiming to compel tech companies to play a more active role in regulating not only misinformation but also AI-generated deepfakes, online scams, and similar threats.
- In the United States, Section 230 of the Communications Act has come under scrutiny from both political sides—President Joe Biden’s administration has advocated scaling back these protections to hold platforms more accountable for extremist content, while former President Donald Trump criticized the law over claims of bias against conservative viewpoints
5. Way Forward
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has indicated that it would draft a Digital India Act (DIA) that would incorporate these changes, but the outlines of how safe harbour would change under this proposed law have not yet been revealed. Moreover, no DIA draft law has been released yet
|
For Prelims: Cyber Crime, Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre, National Cybercrime Reporting Portal, Budapest Convention, Global Cybersecurity Index, International Telecommunication union
For Mains:
1. India witnesses a high number of cybercrimes originating from Southeast Asia. Analyze the challenges this poses for Indian Law Enforcement Agencies and suggest measures to improve cross-border cooperation in tackling cybercrime. (250 words)
2. What are the key functions of the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C)? Critically evaluate its effectiveness in combating cybercrime in India. (250 words)
3. The rise of Internet of Things (IoT) devices introduces new vulnerabilities in cyberspace. Analyze the cybersecurity challenges posed by IoT and suggest measures to mitigate these risks. (250 words)
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1. In India, under cyber insurance for individuals, which of the following benefits are generally covered, in addition to payment for the loss of funds and other benefits? (UPSC 2020)
1. Cost of restoration of the computer system in case of malware disrupting access to one's computer
2. Cost of a new computer if some miscreant wilfully damages it, if proved so
3. Cost of hiring a specialized consultant to minimize the loss in case of cyber extortion
4. Cost of defence in the Court of Law if any third party files a suit
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
A.1, 2 and 4 only B.1, 3 and 4 only C.2 and 3 only D.1, 2, 3 and 4
2. Global Cyber Security Index (GCI) 2020 is released by which of the following organizations? (RRB Clerk Mains 2021)
A. World Bank
B. United Nations Development Programme
C. International Telecommunication Union
D. World Economic Forum
E. None of these
Answers: 1-D, 2-C
|
Source: The Hindu
