CARBON SINK

1. Context

2. Key Points

• It said it would reduce the emissions intensity of its economy emissions per unit of GDP by 45 per cent from the 2005 level instead of the 33 to 35 per cent promised earlier.
• And that it would ensure that renewables formed at least 50 per cent up from the original 40 per cent of its total installed electricity generation capacity.
• The third target is a commitment to increase its carbon sink by 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2030 through the creation of additional Forest and tree cover left untouched.
• India's five-point "Panchamrit" action plan at the Glasgow climate meeting in 2021, there had been no mention of this third commitment.
• The seeming silence over the third commitment gave rise to speculation that India was possibly lagging on this target and that it might not be able to achieve it.

3. Carbon sink in India

• Government figures in 2022 showed that in the six years since 2015, the carbon sink in the country which is the total amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by and residing in forests and trees had increased by 703 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent or roughly 120 million tonnes every year.
• At this pace, the target of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent was unlikely to be met by 2030.
• The carbon sink target was much more ambitious and difficult than the other two which had been achieved about eight years before the deadline. But India was only hedging its bets.

4. The baseline year

• The carbon sink target had not been defined precisely in 2015. 
• India had committed to an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030 but it had made no mention of the baseline year.
• That is, it did not say which year this additional 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent of carbon sink would be measured against.
• By contrast, India's target on emissions intensity specified 2005 as the baseline year.
• And the commitment to renewable capacity did not require a baseline because it was an absolute target.
• The climate targets had been announced in a hurry ahead of the 2015 climate change conference because these were considered crucial to the finalisation of the Paris Agreement.
• India's original targets on emissions intensity and renewable capacity were quite modest and thus easy to define precisely.
• But the carbon sink target required a detailed study, which could not have happened in a short time.

Image source: The Indian Express

5. Additional carbon sink

• There was another apparent ambiguity other than the absence of the baseline year as well.
• In an analysis published in 2019, the Dehradun-based Forest Survey of India (FSI) pointed out that the word "additional" in the Indian commitment could be interpreted in different ways. So, additional carbon sink" could mean 

1. over and above the carbon sink that existed in the baseline year, or
2. over and above what it would be in the target yet as of 2030 in the business-as-usual scenario.

• India's forests and tree cover had a carbon sink of 29.38 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent in 2015 and this was projected to increase in a business-as-usual scenario that is without the intervention of any fresh effort to 31. 87 billion tonnes in 2030 according to the FSI analysis.
• The first interpretation of "additional" (over and above the baseline year) would mean India's target would be met if the carbon sink in 2030 was in the range of 31.88 to 32. 38 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent.
• In the second interpretation (over and above the target year) the target would be between 34. 87 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent.

6. Persisting ambiguity

• Last year, the government appeared to remove the ambiguity regarding the baseline year for the carbon sink target by committing itself to the baseline of 2005.
• In a written reply to a Parliament question on July 25, 2022, Environment Minister said, "India had already achieved 1.97 billion tonnes of additional carbon sinks as compared to the base year of 2005".
• He added that "the remaining target can be achieved by increasing forest and tree cover of the country through the implementation of various central and state sponsored schemes".
• This announcement of 2005 as the baseline suddenly brought the carbon sink target within easy reach.
• Of course, India was well within its right to select 2005 as the baseline year.
• Under the Paris Agreement, countries themselves are supposed to set their climate targets and this includes the choice of baseline year.
• Additionally, as mentioned earlier, India's emissions intensity target also has 2005 as the base year.
• Several other countries including the United States, use 2005 as the baseline year for their commitments.
• The statement in Parliament also seemed to settle the question of additionality flagged by the FSI analysis.
• The promised addition to the carbon sink would have to be measured against what existed in the baseline year (2005) and not what it was projected to be in the target year (2030) in the business-as-usual scenario. This is not unusual. Additionality is measured in most cases from the baseline year.
• Curiously though just 10 days after the Parliament reply, when India formally submitted its updated international climate commitments to the UN climate body on August 4 last year, the forestry target seemingly settled was again left ambiguous.
• There was no mention of the baseline year in India's formal submission.
• While statements in Parliament are considered the official government position, internationally, India can only be held accountable for what is contained in its official submission to the secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
• As of now, this seems to be a minor inconsistency and does not appear to reflect any desire to change the baseline year in future.
• The Environment Ministry has reaffirmed the 2005 baseline in written communication.
• Meanwhile, the rate of increase of carbon stock in India's forests and tree cover has been showing a rising trend, even though the total carbon stock in 2021 was slightly less than what the FSI has projected just two years ago.

For Prelims & Mains