APP Users: If unable to download, please re-install our APP.
Only logged in User can create notes
Only logged in User can create notes

General Studies 2 >> Polity

audio may take few seconds to load

BHARATIYA NYAYA (SECOND) SANHITA BILL, 2023

BHARATIYA NYAYA (SECOND) SANHITA BILL, 2023

 
 
 
1. Context
 
 
Recently, Union Home Minister Amit Shah tabled three revised criminal law bills in the Lok Sabha, aimed at replacing British-era legislation with a modern Indian framework. These bills address the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act, replacing them respectively with the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill.
 

2. Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023
 
  • The revised Bill aligns the definition of terrorism in Section 113 with Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). This modification narrows the scope, removing vague acts and potential categorization of non-violent speech as terrorism.
  • Elimination of vague acts from the definition, focusing on specific elements of threat to national integrity and public safety.
  • Widening the definition to cover the production, smuggling, or circulation of any counterfeit Indian currency or material, departing from the UAPA's limitation to high-quality counterfeit material.
 
Punishments: Possession of property derived from a terrorist act is punishable if held knowingly. Harbouring a terrorist is punishable when done both voluntarily and knowingly. Introduction of the offence of recruiting and training individuals for engaging in terrorist acts, mirroring UAPA sections 18A and 18B.
Prosecution Authority: Explanation allows a Superintendent of Police to decide whether the prosecution should continue under the UAPA or Section 113 of this Bill.
Penalties: Punishable by death or imprisonment for life and Individuals involved in conspiracy, abetment, incitement, or facilitation of a terrorist act could face imprisonment ranging from five years to life.
 
 
Definition of Cruelty and Protection for Women (Section 86)
 

The revised Bill introduces a definition for "cruelty" against women by their husbands and relatives, punishable with a jail term of up to three years. Defines cruelty as willful conduct likely to drive a woman to suicide or cause grave injury, or harassment to coerce her or any related person to meet an unlawful demand for property or valuable security.

  • Restrictions on Reporting Court Proceedings (Section 73): A new provision stipulates a two-year jail sentence and a fine for printing or publishing 'any matter' concerning court proceedings in rape or sexual assault cases without permission.
  • Terminology Updates and Inclusion of Intellectual Disability: The revised Bill addresses regressive terminology concerns by replacing the term 'mental illness' with 'unsoundness of mind' in a majority of the provisions. Additionally, 'intellectual disability' is added alongside 'unsoundness of mind' in section 367.
  • Removal of Minimum Punishment for Mob Lynching: The revised Bill removes the minimum punishment of seven years for mob lynching, aligning the penalty with murder.

 

Ignored Recommendations

  • The Bill does not incorporate recommendations to include gender-neutral provisions criminalizing adultery and non-consensual sex between individuals of all genders.
  • The panel's recommendation to address Section 377 IPC concerns is not reflected in the revised Bill, potentially leaving certain individuals without legal remedies against sexual offences.
  • The revised Bill introduces a precise definition of 'petty organized crime,' focusing on criminal acts committed by members of a group or gang.
  • Included Acts: Theft, snatching, cheating, unauthorized selling of tickets, unauthorized betting or gambling, selling of public examination question papers, or any similar criminal act.
Provides a detailed clarification of included acts under theft, covering various forms such as trick theft, theft from a vehicle, dwelling house, business premises, cargo theft, pickpocketing, theft through card skimming, shoplifting, and theft of an Automated Teller Machine.
 
 
3. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, 2023
 

Community Service as Punishment (Section 23)

The revised Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, 2023 introduces a defined concept of 'community service' as a form of punishment for minor offences. This aims to benefit the community and promote a reparative approach to justice for offences such as attempted suicide, public servants unlawfully engaged in trade, theft of property less than ₹5,000, public intoxication, and defamation.

  • Definition of Community Service: 'Work which the court may order a convict to perform as a form of punishment that benefits the community, for which he shall not be entitled to any remuneration.'
  • Empowered Magistrates: Magistrates of the First or Second Class are specifically empowered to impose community service, emphasizing a localized and more community-oriented approach to justice.

Expansion of Police Power (Section 43(3))

The revised Bill expands the power of the police to use handcuffs, extending it beyond the time of arrest to the stage of production before the court.

  • Initially permitted to prevent the escape of individuals accused of serious offences, this power has been expanded to include the stage of production before the court.
  • The panel recommended restricting handcuff usage to heinous crimes like rape and murder, excluding individuals accused of 'economic offences.'

Court Proceedings and Audio-Visual Means

The revised Bill introduces changes related to the conduct of court proceedings through audio-visual means.

Additions

  • Section 251 now allows the reading out of charge to the accused through audio-visual means.
  • Section 262 permits hearings on discharge through audio-visual means.
  • Section 266 allows the examination of witnesses through audio-visual means.
  • Section 308 introduces the recording of evidence through audio-visual means.

Police Custody Concerns (Section 187(3))

The revised Bill overlooks concerns raised by the panel regarding police custody beyond the initial 15 days of arrest.

  • Section 187(3) no longer contains the phrase 'otherwise than in the custody of the police,' potentially allowing an aggregate of shorter periods of custody throughout the investigation.
  • Concerns are raised about the vulnerability to misuse, particularly for individuals from marginalized backgrounds, emphasizing the need for clarity in interpretation.

Detained Person's Rights (Petty Cases)

Under the revised Bill, detained individuals in petty cases must be produced before the Magistrate or released within 24 hours. Ensures that individuals in petty cases are either produced before the Magistrate or released within 24 hours, safeguarding their rights and minimizing unnecessary detention.

 
 
4. Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, 2023
 

The Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, 2023 addresses the admissibility of electronic evidence, introducing changes to ensure compliance with section 63. An electronic record's admissibility is now expressly subject to section 63, aligning it with the requirement of a certificate under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.

Concerns and Missed Opportunities

Experts have raised concerns regarding missed opportunities to address over-criminalization and expanded police powers in the three revised Bills.

  • Police Custody Duration (BNSS) allowing police custody beyond the initial 15 days is criticized for endangering civil liberties.
  • The BNSS expands the maximum limit of police custody from 15 days to either 60 or 90 days, depending on the nature of the offence.
  • The risk of police excesses, coerced evidence, and fabricated charges due to prolonged detention.
  • The expanded police powers in the BNSS are seen as a significant threat to civil liberties, raising alarm about potential abuses during extended custody. 

The revised Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, 2023 addresses the specific issue of admissibility of electronic evidence. However, concerns persist among experts regarding missed opportunities to rectify broader issues of over-criminalization and expanded police powers, particularly the provision allowing extended police custody. This criticism emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to legislation that upholds civil liberties while addressing legal complexities related to electronic evidence and law enforcement powers.

 

For Prelims: Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), Indian Evidence Act, the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita,  Bharatiya Sakshya (Second) Bill, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

For Mains: 

1. Critically analyze the revised definition of terrorism in the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023. Does it address concerns about vagueness and potential misuse? (250 Words)
2. Discuss the merits and demerits of introducing community service as a form of punishment for minor offences. Consider its potential impact on offender rehabilitation and community engagement. (250 Words)
 
Previous Year Questions
 
1. Considering the following statements in view of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872: (Rajasthan Police Constable 2022) 
1. A map or plan is a document.
2. An inscription written on a metal plate or stone is a document.
3. A caricature is a document.
Which of the above statements are correct?
A. 1 and 2 only        B. 2 and 3 only        C. 1 and 3 only        D. 1, 2 and 3
Answer: D
 
Source: The Hindu

Share to Social