BAN ON ALCOHOL IN INDIAN STATES AND ITS EFFECTS
- One of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) mentions that “in particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health.”
- While DPSPs are not in themselves legally enforceable, they set goals that the state should aspire towards to establish conditions under which citizens can lead a good life
- Thus, alcohol is seen by the Constitution and by extension, the Indian state, as an undesirable evil that needs to be regulated.
- According to the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, alcohol is a state subject, i.e. state legislatures have the right and responsibility to draft laws regarding it, including “the production, manufacture, possession, transport, purchase and sale of intoxicating liquors.”
- Thus, laws regarding alcohol differ from state to state, falling in the whole spectrum between prohibition and private sale
- While the Constitution sets prohibition on alcohol as a goal, for most states, it is very difficult to declare a ban on alcohol.
- This is primarily because liquor revenues are not easy to ignore and have consistently contributed a large share of stgovernment’snts’ revenue.
- For instance, in Maharashtra, state liquor revenues amounted to Rs 11,000 crore in April 2020 (during the nationwide Covid lockdown), compared with Rs 17,000 crore in March.
- The state government attributed much of this drop to the closure of liquor stores, later categorising them as an essential service, in part due to the industry’s contribution to tax revenues.
- The day liquor stores were reopened, the Maharashtra government collected Rs 11 crore in revenue from liquor sales in a single day.
Some states with partial prohibition are Karnataka, which specifically banned country-made arrack in 2007, Maharashtra where the districts of Wardha and Gadhricholi have banned on production and sale of liquor, and Manipur, where districts of Bishnupur, Imphal East, Imphal West and Thoubal have prohibition. |
- There is evidence to show that by and large, prohibition creates opportunities for a thriving underground economy that distributes liquor, outside the regulatory framework of the state.
- While the government made liquor more inaccessible, it is impossible to take it out of circulation completely.
- Furthermore, prohibition disproportionately affects poorer sections of society with upper classes still being able to prexpensivelyensive (and safe) alcohol
- Even in the case of Bihar, a majority of cases registered under its prohibition laws are on the less privileged.
- However, prohibition might have some limited benefits as well. Various studies have provided evidence linking alcohol with domestic abuse or domestic violence.
- In India, prohibition has often been framed as a “women’s rights” issue.
- A report by the Sexual Violence Research Initiative says that after prohibition was introduced in 2016, “crimes again have declined both in terms of rate (registered cases per 100,000 female population) and incidence (absolute numbers).”
- While other factors may also be involved, other studies have shown marginal improvement in certain kinds of crime after prohibition.
For Mains:
1. How does the Indian constitution look at alcohol, Does prohibiting alcohol work?
|