SYLLOGISM

Back

SYLLOGISM

 
 
A syllogism is a form of logical reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises). These premises share a common term, and the conclusion contains a term not present in the premises. The structure typically consists of three parts: major premise, minor premise, and conclusion
 
 
What is Syllogism?
 

Here's a breakdown of the components of a syllogism:

  • Major Premise:

    • This is a general statement that sets the context for the argument.
    • Example: "All humans are mortal."

  • Minor Premise:

    • This is a specific statement related to the major premise.
    • Example: "Socrates is a human."

  • Conclusion:

    • This is the logical inference or deduction drawn from the premises.
    • Example: "Therefore, Socrates is mortal."

Syllogisms can be categorized based on their validity and structure. The three main types are:

  • Categorical Syllogism:

    • Involves statements about categories or classes.
    • Example: "All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal."

  • Hypothetical Syllogism:

    • Involves conditional statements or hypotheses.
    • Example: "If it is raining, then the ground is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground is wet."

  • Disjunctive Syllogism:

    • Involves a choice between two possibilities.
    • Example: "Either the car is in the garage, or it is in the driveway. The car is not in the garage. Therefore, the car is in the driveway."
 
 
Types of Syllogism in Reasoning
 

Syllogisms in reasoning can be categorized into different types based on their structure and the relationships between the premises. The main types of syllogisms include:

  • Categorical Syllogism:

    • Involves statements about categories or classes.
    • Each statement has a subject, a predicate, and a middle term.
    • Example: "All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal."

  • Hypothetical Syllogism:

    • Involves conditional statements or hypotheses.
    • Consists of three propositions, often in an "if-then" format.
    • Example: "If it is raining, then the ground is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground is wet."

  • Disjunctive Syllogism:

    • Involves a choice between two or more possibilities.
    • Typically has a statement that presents mutually exclusive options.
    • Example: "Either the car is in the garage, or it is in the driveway. The car is not in the garage. Therefore, the car is in the driveway."

  • Conditional Syllogism:

    • Involves statements with a conditional relationship.
    • Typically follows an "if-then" structure.
    • Example: "If it is a weekday, then I go to work. Today is a weekday. Therefore, I go to work today."

  • Transitive Syllogism:

    • Involves a chain of logical relationships.
    • If A is related to B, and B is related to C, then A is related to C.
    • Example: "All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal."

  • Exclusive Syllogism:

    • Involves a situation where one and only one of the given options is true.
    • Typically has the word "only" in the statements.
    • Example: "Only birds can fly. Penguins cannot fly. Therefore, penguins are not birds."

  • Comparative Syllogism:

    • Involves comparing different elements.
    • Establishes a relationship between two or more items.
    • Example: "Some cats are larger than dogs. Fluffy is a cat. Therefore, Fluffy might be larger than some dogs."
 
 
Tips and Tricks 
 

Solving syllogism questions in reasoning can be challenging, but with practice and the right approach, you can improve your ability to analyze logical relationships. Here are some tips and tricks to help you solve syllogism questions effectively:

  • Understand the Basics:

    • Familiarize yourself with the basic terms used in syllogisms, such as major premise, minor premise, and conclusion.
    • Know the standard forms of categorical syllogisms and their symbols.

  • Use Venn Diagrams:

    • Draw Venn diagrams to visually represent the relationships between categories or classes in the premises.
    • Venn diagrams can help you visualize the overlapping or non-overlapping regions and identify the logical conclusions.

  • Identify Standard Forms:

    • Recognize common standard forms of syllogisms, such as "All A are B," "No A is B," "Some A are B," etc.
    • Knowing these standard forms will help you quickly categorize statements.

  • Apply the Complementary Pairs Rule:

    • Understand the complementary pairs rule, which states that if two statements are complementary (opposite), only one of them can be true.
    • Example: "All A are B" and "No A is B" are complementary.

  • Use the Possibility Cases Approach:

    • Consider different possibilities based on the given statements.
    • Create scenarios where the premises are true and evaluate the conclusions in each case.

  • Pay Attention to Quantifiers:

    • Quantifiers such as "all," "no," and "some" play a crucial role in determining the validity of syllogisms.
    • Understand how these quantifiers impact the relationship between categories.
 
 
Statement Definite Conclusion Possible Conclusion(s)
All humans are mammals. Some mammals are humans. None (as "all" indicates a universal claim).
No reptiles are birds. Some birds are not reptiles. None (as "no" indicates an absolute claim).
Some students like math. Some students do not like math. All students like math (contrary possibility).
Some roses are red. Some red things are roses. None (ambiguous without more information).
All politicians are honest. Some honest people are politicians. None (as "all" implies a specific claim).
No dogs are insects. Some insects are not dogs. None (as "no" implies an absolute claim).
 
 

 

Solved Examples of Syllogism
 
 

Example 1: Statements:

  1. All dogs are mammals.
  2. Some mammals are animals.

Conclusions:

  1. Some animals are dogs.
  2. All dogs are animals.

Solution:

  1. From the given statements, we can draw the conclusion that "Some animals are dogs" because the overlap between mammals and animals includes dogs.

  2. The conclusion "All dogs are animals" is also valid as every dog is a mammal, and some mammals are animals.

Therefore, both conclusions are valid.

 

Example 2: Statements:

  1. No fruits are vegetables.
  2. All apples are fruits.

Conclusions:

  1. No apples are vegetables.
  2. Some vegetables are not fruits.

Solution:

  1. The conclusion "No apples are vegetables" is valid as apples are a type of fruit, and no fruits are vegetables.

  2. The conclusion "Some vegetables are not fruits" is also valid since all apples are fruits, and no fruits are vegetables.

Therefore, both conclusions are valid.

 

Example 3: Statements:

  1. All roses are flowers.
  2. Some flowers are not tulips.

Conclusions:

  1. Some roses are not tulips.
  2. All tulips are flowers.

Solution:

  1. The conclusion "Some roses are not tulips" is valid as there is no specific connection between roses and tulips in the given statements.

  2. The conclusion "All tulips are flowers" is also valid since all roses are flowers, and tulips are a type of flower.

Therefore, both conclusions are valid.
Share to Social

Related Papers

SECTORS OF INDIAN ECONOMY ...

Read more

SOIL...

Read more

ATTITUDE...

Read more

UNION...

Read more