Urbanisation and the challenge of ideal transit solutions
For Prelims
What:
The editorial focuses on India’s urban mobility challenge in the context of Viksit Bharat 2047 and evaluates current and future public transport models, especially in light of demographic shifts and infrastructure needs.
Why:
With more than 60% of India’s population expected to live in urban areas by the 2060s, ensuring efficient, affordable, and sustainable public transportation is vital for economic productivity, environmental goals, and equitable urban development.
Who:
Key initiatives referenced include the PM e-Bus Sewa, PM e-Drive scheme, and the Economic Survey 2023-24. The editorial also brings in comparisons with countries like Brazil and China, and evaluates India's efforts relative to global benchmarks. Emerging models like trams and trolleybuses are discussed as alternatives.
Outcome:
The editorial urges Indian policymakers to critically reassess their current preference for e-buses and metros in favor of more sustainable, cost-efficient, and climate-aligned options like trams, especially in light of long-term fiscal constraints and operational inefficiencies.
For Mains
GS II / GS III: Governance, Urbanization, Infrastructure Development
1. Analyze the challenges faced by India in providing effective urban mobility solutions amid rapid urbanization.
-
With over 60% of the population projected to live in cities by 2060s, urban transport must accommodate a large working population.
-
Metro expansion is capital intensive, underperforming on ridership and profitability.
-
Existing urban bus systems are inadequate (35,000 operational vs. 200,000 needed).
-
Last-mile connectivity, affordability, and sustainability remain bottlenecks.
2. Evaluate the effectiveness of government schemes such as PM e-Bus Sewa and PM e-Drive in bridging India’s urban transport deficit.
-
PM e-Bus Sewa aims to induct 10,000 new buses.
-
PM e-Drive supports procurement of over 1.25 lakh electric vehicles.
-
Budgetary allocations are rising, but private investment is limited due to low returns.
-
Long-term viability of e-buses questioned due to high operational/replacement costs.
3. Should India invest in reviving trams and trolleybuses in urban mobility planning? Justify with lifecycle cost and climate considerations.
-
Trams offer 45% long-term profitability over 70 years.
-
E-buses show 82% net loss due to maintenance and battery costs.
-
Trams align with climate goals and are scalable; trolleybuses also viable though less efficient.
-
Proposal to reintroduce trams in Kochi could redefine India’s approach to sustainable transport.
Highlights of the EditorialUrbanization and Growth Vision
Policy Initiatives and Gaps
Alternatives in Urban Mobility
Fiscal & Environmental Sustainability
|
The editorial strongly advocates for a re-evaluation of urban transport priorities in India. Instead of chasing technology-driven, subsidy-heavy models, India must consider historically proven, financially viable, and climate-conscious transit systems like trams. These systems not only support India's net-zero ambitions but also promote equitable, accessible, and resilient urban growth in line with the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047
Mains Practice Questions
|