UPSC Editorial

Back

General Studies 2 >> International Relations

EDITORIAL ANALYSIS: Katchatheevu demands thinking outside the box

Katchatheevu demands thinking outside the box

 
 
For Prelims: India-Sri Lanka, Katchatheevu island, LTTE, Sri Lanka Civil War, Exclusive Economic Zones
For Mains: General Studies II: International Relations, Disputes related to two Countries like Sri Linka and India
 
 
Highlights of the Article
 
Significance of Katchatheevu Island
History & Background related to Katchatheevu
Indo-Sri Lankan Maritime Agreement and Fishing Rights
Tamil Nadu's Stance on Katchatheevu
Solution on Katchatheevu Issue
 
Context
In his first term in office, Prime Minister Narendra Modi entrusted to his colleague and then Union Minister of State for Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, Pon Radhakrishnan, the task of finding a solution to the Indian fishermen’s issue with Sri Lanka.
 
UPSC EXAM NOTES ANALYSIS
 
1.Significance of Katchatheevu Island
 

Katchatheevu is a small, uninhabited island covering 285 acres situated in the Palk Strait, positioned between India and Sri Lanka. It measures approximately 1.6 kilometres in length and slightly over 300 meters wide at its widest point.

  • The island is located northeast of Rameswaram, around 33 kilometres from the Indian coastline. It is situated approximately 62 kilometres southwest of Jaffna, which is at the northern tip of Sri Lanka. Moreover, Katchatheevu is about 24 kilometres away from Delft Island, an inhabited island that belongs to Sri Lanka.
  • The notable feature on Katchatheevu Island is the St. Anthony’s Church, built in the early 20th century. This Catholic shrine holds cultural and religious importance, especially during its annual festival. Christian priests from both India and Sri Lanka conduct services during this festival, attracting devotees from both countries who make pilgrimages to the island. In 2023, around 2,500 Indians travelled from Rameswaram to participate in this significant event.
  • Despite its religious and cultural significance, Katchatheevu is not suitable for permanent human settlement due to the absence of a reliable source of drinking water on the island. This limitation restricts any long-term habitation on the island, making it primarily a site for occasional religious gatherings and pilgrimages.
2.History & Background related to Katchatheevu

Katchatheevu Island, formed as a result of a volcanic eruption in the 14th century, holds a relatively recent place in the geological timeline.

  • During the early medieval period, Katchatheevu was under the control of the Jaffna kingdom of Sri Lanka. However, by the 17th century, control shifted to the Ramnad Zamindari, which was based in Ramanathapuram, approximately 55 kilometres northwest of Rameswaram.
  • With the advent of colonial rule, Katchatheevu became part of the Madras Presidency under the British administration. In 1921, both India and Sri Lanka, then British colonies, laid claim to Katchatheevu to delineate fishing boundaries in the region.
  • A survey conducted during this period marked Katchatheevu as part of Sri Lanka. However, a British delegation from India contested this claim, asserting ownership of the island by the Ramnad kingdom.
  • The dispute over the ownership of Katchatheevu persisted until 1974 when a final resolution was reached. This resolution marked a significant milestone in clarifying the status of the island and delineating the maritime boundaries between India and Sri Lanka
3.Indo-Sri Lankan Maritime Agreement and Fishing Rights

In 1974, efforts were made by then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to resolve the maritime border dispute between India and Sri Lanka permanently. This initiative led to the establishment of the 'Indo-Sri Lankan Maritime Agreement,' which resulted in the cession of Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka by India.

  • Under the agreement, Indira Gandhi decided to "cede" Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka, perceiving the island to hold little strategic value for India. This move was intended to strengthen diplomatic ties between the two neighbouring countries.
  • Despite ceding the island, Indian fishermen were granted continued access to Katchatheevu as per the agreement, maintaining their traditional fishing practices in the region. However, the agreement did not explicitly address the issue of fishing rights, leading to subsequent challenges and differing interpretations.
  • Sri Lanka interpreted Indian fishermen's access to Katchatheevu as limited to activities such as resting, drying nets, and visiting the Catholic shrine, without requiring a visa. This interpretation created ambiguity regarding the extent of fishing rights granted to Indian fishermen in the waters surrounding Katchatheevu.
  • In 1976, another agreement during India's Emergency period further complicated matters by prohibiting both countries from fishing in each other's Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). However, Katchatheevu lies at the boundary of both countries' EEZs, adding to the uncertainty surrounding fishing rights and activities in the region.
  • The agreements made in the 1970s regarding Katchatheevu and fishing rights have left unresolved issues, contributing to periodic tensions and disputes between Indian fishermen and Sri Lankan authorities. The lack of clear delineation and mutual understanding regarding fishing access around Katchatheevu continues to be a contentious issue between India and Sri Lanka
4.Tamil Nadu's Stance on Katchatheevu
 

The issue of Katchatheevu holds significant political and emotional weight in Tamil Nadu, with successive governments and leaders advocating for its retrieval and the restoration of fishing rights for Tamil fishermen.

  • The decision to "cede" Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka in 1974 without consulting the Tamil Nadu state assembly sparked immediate protests. This decision was seen as infringing on traditional fishing rights and livelihoods of Indian Tamil fishermen, given the historical ties of the Ramnad Zamindari to the island.
  • The Tamil Nadu Assembly has consistently demanded the retrieval of Katchatheevu and the restoration of fishing rights. Leaders like J Jayalalitha and MK Stalin, among others, have actively pursued this agenda through legal and diplomatic channels.
  • In 2008, Jayalalitha filed a petition arguing that ceding Katchatheevu required a constitutional amendment and had adversely affected fishermen's rights. Similar efforts were made by other leaders, including appeals to the Supreme Court.
  • Despite Tamil Nadu's persistent demands, the Union government's stance has remained unchanged. It asserts that since Katchatheevu has been under dispute historically, no territorial or sovereignty claims were ceded.
  • While there is vocal demand for Katchatheevu's retrieval, practical challenges hinder such efforts. The Union government has pointed out that revisiting Katchatheevu's status would require drastic measures, potentially leading to diplomatic complexities or conflict.

5. Solution towards Katchatheevu Dispute

 

  • The exploration into this topic by the author commenced in the early 1990s with the aim of finding a peaceful resolution to safeguard the fishermen's livelihoods. A significant challenge encountered was the unavailability of primary sources concerning Katchatheevu, as they had been relocated to New Delhi. Given the absence of a Right to Information Act at the time, the author had to rely on secondary sources and interviews with key figures.
  • In 1974, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then in the Opposition, likened the transfer of Katchatheevu to a philanthropic act ("Bhoodan") during a debate in the Lok Sabha. He urged BJP leader Jana Krishnamurthy to pursue legal recourse by filing a case in the Madras High Court.
  • However, Jana's appeal was dismissed due to a lack of evidence substantiating Katchatheevu's historical status as part of the Zamindari of the Raja of Ramnad and its subsequent integration into the Madras Presidency following the Zamindari's abolition.
  • After thorough consideration of the advantages and disadvantages, the author proposed two solutions. Firstly, to negotiate the return of Katchatheevu on a perpetual lease, akin to the Tin Bigha agreement in reverse.
  • This arrangement would affirm Sri Lanka's sovereignty over the island while granting India fishing rights in the surrounding waters under the lease. Secondly, to allow Indian fishermen access to fish in Sri Lankan waters up to a distance of five nautical miles. This suggestion was based on a precedent set by the 1976 Agreement, which permitted Sri Lankan fishermen to operate near the Wadge Bank near Kanniyakumari for a limited period.
  • Although the Tamil Nadu governments, led by both the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, endorsed the author's proposals, the primary obstacle remained New Delhi's reluctance to reopen discussions on the matter.
  • It is noteworthy to highlight that during the 1960s and 1970s, India faced severe financial constraints, prompting Indira Gandhi's administration to incentivize ventures that generated foreign exchange.
  • Prawns emerged as a lucrative commodity in international markets, particularly in Japan and Europe. Consequently, bottom trawlers were introduced in the Palk Bay, capitalizing on the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka.
  • The ban on fishing imposed by the Sri Lankan government prompted Tamil fishermen from Sri Lanka to seek refuge in India.
  • Employed by trawler owners, these refugees facilitated Indian fishermen's incursion into Sri Lankan waters.
  • While India's foreign exchange earnings surged, primarily attributed to prawns caught in Sri Lankan waters, the use of bottom trawlers inflicted significant damage to the seabed, depleting fish stocks on the Indian side of the Palk Bay.
  • Sri Lankan fishermen voiced concerns over the adverse impact of Indian trawlers on their marine ecosystem, leading to the prohibition of bottom trawling in Sri Lanka.
  • The imperative of fostering positive personal relations with Sri Lankan Prime Minister Mrs. Bandaranaike underscored India's Sri Lanka policy. By early 1974, Mrs. Gandhi was inclined to cede Katchatheevu.
  • According to S.P. Jagota, then Director of the Legal and Treaties Division, Mrs. Gandhi disregarded the advice of senior officials and was even willing to adjust the median line to ensure Katchatheevu fell within Sri Lankan territory.
  • However, the Agreement relinquished India's right to continue fishing in the waters surrounding the island, as stipulated in the 1976 Agreement
6. Conclusion
 
Every challenge provides an opportunity. The problems in the Palk Bay can be solved only if we start thinking outside the box. Here are two suggestions. The Palk Bay is not a barrier but a bridge between India and Sri Lanka. We must convert the Palk Bay from being a contested territory to one that is a common heritage. The first essential prerequisite is for the Government of India to ban all fishing equipment which are banned in Sri Lanka. And then, we should work to ensure that fishermen can equitably enjoy the rich marine wealth. There can be a formula: Sri Lankan fishermen can fish in the Palk Bay for three days, while Indian fishermen can fish on the other three days. One day can be a holiday. Second, let us encourage the Tamil fishermen of both countries to meet, form cooperative societies, and venture into deep-sea fishing. The trawlers can be modified into vessels that can assist the mother ship
 

 

Practice Mains Questions
 
1.Discuss the historical context and implications of the Katchatheevu Island dispute between India and Sri Lanka. Evaluate potential strategies and diplomatic measures to address the dispute and strengthen bilateral relations between the two nations

2.Describe the historical background and key events leading to the Katchatheevu Island dispute between India and Sri Lanka. Analyze the significance of the island in terms of territorial sovereignty and maritime boundaries.

3.Discuss the socio-economic implications of the Katchatheevu Island dispute on the livelihoods of fishermen from Tamil Nadu and the Northern Province of Sri Lanka. Evaluate the challenges faced by both parties and suggest measures to mitigate the impact on affected communities.

4.Assess the legal dimensions of the Katchatheevu Island dispute, considering international law, bilateral agreements, and historical treaties. Analyze the validity of claims and counterclaims made by India and Sri Lanka regarding territorial sovereignty and fishing rights


Share to Social