THREE LANGUAGE POLICY
- The NEP 2020 continues with the three-language formula, originally introduced in the 1968 NEP. However, a key distinction is that while the earlier policy mandated Hindi as a compulsory language nationwide, NEP 2020 adopts a more flexible approach.
- Under the 1968 policy, Hindi-speaking states were required to teach Hindi, English, and a modern Indian language—preferably one from southern India—whereas non-Hindi-speaking states had to include their regional language, Hindi, and English in their curriculum.
- In contrast, the NEP 2020 does not impose any particular language on states. Instead, it allows states, regions, and students to choose their three languages, provided that at least two of them are Indian languages.
- This implies that while students must learn their state’s language, the additional Indian language does not have to be Hindi. The policy also highlights the importance of bilingual education, particularly in the home language or mother tongue alongside English.
- Additionally, Sanskrit is given notable emphasis as an optional choice within the three-language framework
The Three-Language Formula is an educational policy in India designed to promote multilingualism and linguistic harmony in a country with immense linguistic diversity. It was first proposed by the Kothari Commission in 1968 and has since been adopted by many states, with variations based on regional needs. The formula aims to balance the learning of regional, national, and international languages to foster unity, cultural preservation, and global competitiveness.
Key Objectives of the Three-Language Formula:
-
Promote National Integration:
-
By encouraging the study of Hindi (the official language of the Union) and English (an associate official language), the formula seeks to bridge communication gaps between states and promote national unity.
-
It also respects regional languages, ensuring that local cultures and identities are preserved.
-
-
Preserve Linguistic Diversity:
-
India is home to hundreds of languages and dialects. The formula ensures that students learn their mother tongue or regional language, helping to sustain linguistic heritage.
-
-
Enhance Global Competence:
-
The inclusion of English, a global lingua franca, prepares students for higher education and professional opportunities in an increasingly interconnected world.
-
-
Facilitate Communication:
-
The formula aims to equip students with proficiency in multiple languages, enabling them to communicate effectively across different regions and cultures within India.
-
Structure of the Three-Language Formula:
-
First Language: The mother tongue or regional language of the state.
-
Second Language: Hindi (in non-Hindi-speaking states) or another Indian language (in Hindi-speaking states).
-
Third Language: English or a modern Indian language (depending on the state's policy)
- Tamil Nadu has historically opposed the imposition of Hindi. In 1937, when the C. Rajagopalachari-led government in Madras sought to make Hindi a compulsory subject in secondary schools, the Justice Party strongly resisted the move.
- During the protests, two young activists, Thalamuthu and Natarajan, lost their lives and became symbols of the anti-Hindi movement. Following widespread opposition, Rajaji resigned, and the British administration repealed the order.
- In 1965, as the deadline for making Hindi the sole official language of India approached, large-scale protests erupted in Tamil Nadu, resulting in the deaths of at least 70 people due to police action or self-immolation.
- The issue resurfaced when Parliament passed the Official Languages (Amendment) Act, 1967, and the Official Language Resolution, 1968, which mandated Hindi instruction under the three-language formula.
- In response, the C.N. Annadurai-led DMK government passed a resolution in January 1968, advocating for the abolition of the three-language policy and the removal of Hindi from Tamil Nadu's school curriculum.
- Since then, the state has consistently adhered to a two-language system, offering instruction only in Tamil and English. Both the ruling DMK and the opposition AIADMK have steadfastly resisted any attempts to modify this approach. In 2019, widespread opposition led the Kasturirangan Committee to drop the mandatory Hindi clause from the draft National Education Policy (NEP
- Political parties and activists in Tamil Nadu perceive the three-language policy as a covert attempt to introduce Hindi under the guise of linguistic diversity. They argue that, in reality, implementing this policy would inevitably result in Hindi being taught, as there are limited resources available for recruiting teachers and developing learning materials for other languages.
- Additionally, the Union Government and key BJP leaders have consistently advocated for the expansion of Hindi. In 2019, the Union Budget allocated ₹50 crore for hiring Hindi teachers in non-Hindi-speaking states.
- Critics argue that the Centre’s actions contradict its stated commitment to promoting regional languages, pointing to the insufficient recruitment of regional language teachers in Kendriya Vidyalayas and the lack of efforts to introduce South Indian languages in schools north of the Vindhyas
|
For Prelims: NEP 2020, National Curriculum Framework, Sustainable Development Goals, University Grants Commission, Kothari Commission, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan,
For Mains:
1. Discuss the key provisions and objectives of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. How does it aim to transform the Indian education system, and what are its implications for inclusive development? (250 Words)
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1. Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2018)
1. As per the Right to Education (RTE) Act, to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in a State, a person would be required to possess the minimum qualification laid down by the State Council of Teacher Education concerned.
2. As per the RTE Act, for teaching primary classes, a candidate is required to pass a Teacher Eligibility Test conducted in accordance with the National Council of Teacher Education guidelines.
3. In India, more than 90% of teacher education institutions are directly under the State Governments.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 (d) 3 only
Answer: B
2. Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2016)
1. The Sustainable Development Goals were first proposed in 1972 by a global think tank called the 'Club of Rome'.
2. The Sustainable Development Goals have to be achieved by 2030.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A.1 only B. 2 only C. Both 1 and 2 D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: B
3. The objective(s) of Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyaan is/are: (UKSSSC Forest Guard 2021)
A. To provide quality based education to all children from 14 to 18 years
B. Universal standstill till the year 2020
C. To provide residential school for the students of remote areas
D. All of the above
Answer: D
|
