APP Users: If unable to download, please re-install our APP.
Only logged in User can create notes
Only logged in User can create notes

General Studies 3 >> Agriculture

audio may take few seconds to load

NUTRIENT-BASED SUBSIDY (NBS)

NUTRIENT-BASED SUBSIDY (NBS)

 
 
 
 
1. Context
 
 
Recently, The Government of India has brought di-ammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP) and all other such fertilisers that receive nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) support under “reasonable pricing” controls.
 
 
2. About Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS)
 

Nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) is a scheme implemented by the Indian government to provide subsidies on fertilizers based on the nutrient content (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Sulfur) rather than the type of fertilizer. This aims to encourage farmers to use fertilizers more efficiently and judiciously, promoting balanced nutrient application for their crops.

The determination of prices of NBS fertilizers 

NBS fertilizer prices are not directly determined by the government. Instead, the government announces fixed per-kg subsidy rates for each nutrient (N, P, K, and S). Manufacturers and importers of fertilizers then determine the selling price by considering:

  • Cost of production and import includes raw material costs, processing costs, and import duties.
  • Manufacturers consider market demand for specific fertilizers and adjust prices accordingly.
  • Fixed subsidy per kg of nutrient is directly deducted from the selling price, making nutrient-rich fertilizers more affordable for farmers.

Therefore, the final selling price of an NBS fertilizer depends on a combination of these factors, resulting in dynamic pricing based on market forces while ensuring affordability through the fixed subsidy.

NBS rates

NBS rates represent the fixed amount of subsidy provided by the government per kg of each nutrient. These rates are announced by the government twice a year, for Kharif and Rabi seasons, and are based on various factors like:

  1. Fluctuations in global prices impact production costs and influence subsidy levels.
  2. Availability and demand for fertilizers within India influence the subsidy needed to ensure affordability.
  3. The total budget allocated for fertilizer subsidies determines the level of support provided for each nutrient.

Benefits of NBS

  • Encourages farmers to focus on specific nutrient needs of their crops, reducing wastage and promoting balanced soil fertility.
  • By targeting subsidies towards specific nutrients, the government can potentially control overall subsidy expenditure.
  • Transparent pricing based on nutrient content allows for better market understanding and informed decision-making by farmers.
  • Balanced nutrient application can lead to healthier soil, improving long-term crop yields and sustainability.

Challenges of NBS

  • Farmers might need more education and support to understand and utilize the NBS scheme effectively.
  • Potential for manufacturers to exploit the system by manipulating nutrient content or prices.
  • Accurate soil testing and data on crop-specific nutrient requirements are crucial for the optimal utilization of NBS, but these aspects might need further development.
 

3. Fertilizer Consumption in India

 

Fertilizer consumption in India is a critical aspect of the country's agriculture sector, contributing significantly to the overall productivity of crops. The use of fertilizers helps enhance soil fertility and ensures better yields. 

Fertilizers are substances added to soil to enhance plant growth by supplying essential nutrients. These nutrients, primarily nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S), are crucial for various plant functions like photosynthesis, root development, and fruit production.

Urea is a white, crystalline fertilizer containing the highest concentration of nitrogen (46%) among commonly used fertilizers. It is readily soluble in water and readily absorbed by plants, making it a popular choice for quick nitrogen supply. However, excessive urea use can have drawbacks.

 

Reasons for the Shift from Urea to DAP

Several factors have driven the recent shift from excessive urea use towards increased diammonium phosphate (DAP) consumption:

Imbalanced Nutrient Use: India has traditionally relied heavily on urea, leading to imbalanced soil fertility with excess nitrogen and deficiencies in other nutrients like phosphorus. This can harm soil health, reduce crop yields, and contribute to environmental issues like nitrate leaching.

Government Initiatives: Recognizing the need for balanced fertilization, the government has:

  1. Reduced the subsidy on urea aims to discourage its overuse and encourage farmers to explore other nutrient sources.
  2. Promoted DAP: Increased subsidy on DAP to make it more affordable and incentivize its use.
  3. The Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme provides subsidies based on the nutrient content (N, P, K, S) of fertilizers, further encouraging balanced use.

Soil Health Concerns: Excessive urea application can:

  • Increasing soil acidity can harm beneficial soil microbes and reduce nutrient availability for plants.
  • Contribute to nitrate leaching: Excess nitrogen can leach into groundwater, causing potential health risks and environmental damage.

Phosphorus Deficiency: Indian soils are often deficient in phosphorus, which plays a crucial role in root development and crop yields. DAP provides readily available phosphorus, addressing this deficiency.

Improved Crop Response: DAP can be more effective than urea in some crops and soil types, leading to improved yields and farmer income.

 

4. The Way Forward

The NBS scheme aims to promote balanced fertilizer use and improve soil health. The recent shift from urea to DAP reflects these goals and the government's efforts to incentivize balanced nutrient application for sustainable agriculture.

 

For Prelims: Nutrient-Based Subsidy, Fertilizers, Urea, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium,  sulfur, Kharif, Rabi, di-ammonium phosphate

For Mains: 

1. Discuss the potential economic and environmental implications of the recent shift from urea to DAP consumption in India. (250 Words)
2. Discuss the ethical concerns associated with the use of chemical fertilizers, including their potential impact on human health and the environment. (250 Words)
 
 
 
Previous Year Questions
 
1. With reference to chemical fertilizers in India, consider the following statements: (UPSC 2020)
1. At present, the retail price of chemical fertilizers is market-driven and not administered by the Government.
2. Ammonia, which is an input of urea, is produced form natural gas.
3. Sulphur, which is a raw material for phosphoric acid fertilizer, is a by-product of oil refineries.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only         B. 2 and 3 only         C. 2 only            D. 1, 2 and 3
 
 
2.  With reference to the cultivation of Kharif crops in India in the last five years, consider the following statements: (UPSC 2019)
  1. Area under rice cultivation is the highest.
  2. Area under the cultivation of jowar is more than that of oilseeds.
  3. Area of cotton cultivation is more than that of sugarcane.
  4. Area under sugarcane cultivation has steadily decreased.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 3 only       (b) 2, 3 and 4 only       (c) 2 and 4 only          (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

 

3. Consider the following crops: (2013)

  1. Cotton
  2. Groundnut
  3. Rice
  4. Wheat

Which of these are Kharif crops?

(a) 1 and 4        (b) 2 and 3 only           (c) 1, 2 and 3                  (d) 2, 3 and 4

Answers: 1-B, 2-A, 3-C

Source: The Indian Express


Share to Social