Only logged in User can create notes
Only logged in User can create notes

General Studies 2 >> Governance

audio may take few seconds to load



 NAAC released a statement addressing the allegations, saying, “As per the mandate of NAAC, the entire process of accreditation and assessment is robust, transparent, ICT-driven and automated
2.Process of Accreditation
  • The current approach has been described as “input-based”. In other words, NAAC relies heavily on self-assessment reports of applicant institutions.
  • The first step has an applicant institution submitting a self-study report of information related to quantitative and qualitative metrics. The data is then validated by NAAC expert teams, followed by peer team visits to the institutions. This last step has sparked controversy.
  • NAAC released the improved grading, terming the allegations as “false”. Interestingly, the controversy has surfaced at a time when the council is considering reducing the role of the peer team visits in the overall scheme of things.
  • “The process of Peer Team Visits adds substantial effort on the part of both NAAC and the HEIs. Hence, we recommend that the role of Peer Team visits be facilitatory and not have a significant weightage in assessment and accreditation.
2. Functions of NAAC
  • The NAAC, set up in 1994, is entrusted with assessing the quality of India’s higher educational institutions.
  • Following a multi-layered assessment process, it awards grades to colleges and universities
  • Its parameters include curriculum, faculty, infrastructure, research and financial well-being
  • The grades issued by NAAC range from A++ to C. If an institution is graded D, it means it is not accredited
  • The first step involves an institute approaching the NAAC for assessment
  • Once the NAAC sets the process in motion, the applicant has to submit a self-study report (SSR) containing information related to quantitative and qualitative metrics
  • The data is then validated by expert teams of the NAAC, followed by spot visits by peer teams comprising assessors drawn from universities across India
3.Importance of Mandatory Accreditation
  • While the UGC has over the years issued many circulars directing institutes to mandatorily undergo NAAC’s assessment, the process still remains largely voluntary
  • The National Education Policy (2020) has set an ambitious target of getting all higher educational institutes to obtain the highest level of accreditation over the next 15 years
  • However, according to information shared by the Centre in Lok Sabha in February 2023, out of the 1,113 universities and 43,796 colleges in the All India Survey on Higher Education Report 2020-21, only 418 universities and 9,062 colleges were NAAC-accredited as on January 31, 2023
  • According to current and former officials of the NAAC, the fear of obtaining poor grades holds institutes back from applying
  • In 2019, the UGC had launched a scheme named ‘Paramarsh’ to address the issue. Under the scheme, some of the best performing institutes were identified to serve as mentors to at least five institutes aspiring to get accredited
  • Currently, only institutes that are at least six years old, or from where at least two batches of students have graduated, can apply. The accreditation is valid for five years

Share to Social