INDIAN AND AMERICAN DEMOCRACIES
1. Context
While India has completed its general elections in mid-2024 and the new government has assumed office, the US is gearing up for its own electoral process, with the presidential elections set to take place soon.
2. Democracy and India
In mid-2024, India concluded its general elections, leading to the establishment of a new government. As this unfolds, the United States is preparing for its upcoming presidential election.
India, recognized as the world’s largest democracy, has once again demonstrated the strength of its electoral system, with over 640 million citizens casting their votes. In contrast, the United States, one of the world’s oldest democracies, upholds a tradition of representative governance that has shaped global democratic values for over 200 years. The resilience of these two diverse democratic frameworks is grounded in their well-designed constitutions, which form the backbone of each nation’s governance. Although each constitution envisions distinct political systems, both share some similarities as well as notable differences.
3. India's Constitutional Journey
- The Indian Constitution establishes a parliamentary democracy within a federal framework. It follows a dual executive model, where the Prime Minister acts as the head of government and holds real executive power, while the President, as the head of state, primarily serves a ceremonial role.
- India's quasi-federal system allocates power between a strong central government and the states, which do not possess the authority to withdraw from the union. The Constitution also blends elements of American judicial supremacy with British parliamentary supremacy.
- India’s Supreme Court has the power of judicial review to invalidate parliamentary laws that conflict with constitutional principles, whereas Parliament retains the authority to amend the Constitution, provided these changes do not alter its basic structure
4. US Constitutional System
- The U.S. Constitution establishes a presidential system in which the President serves as both the official and functional executive, holding powers as both head of state and head of government. This structure is rooted in the doctrine of separation of powers, keeping the executive distinct from the legislature and conferring substantial authority upon the President.
- The U.S. also has a federal system, granting states significant autonomy relative to the federal government, with residual powers residing with the states. Judicial supremacy is central, as the Supreme Court holds the authority to deem any law unconstitutional, ensuring oversight of the legislative branch.
- Unlike India, the U.S. Constitution has a rigorous amendment process, lacking a counterpart to India’s basic structure doctrine. Amendments require approval by a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress, followed by ratification from three-quarters of the states.
- This challenging process has limited the U.S. Constitution to only 27 amendments since 1787, while India’s more adaptable amendment process has led to 106 amendments since 1949
5. Similarities between Indian and American
- Both the Indian and U.S. constitutions share notable similarities as well as fundamental differences in their underlying philosophies and structural approaches, beyond those already highlighted. India’s Constituent Assembly crafted its constitution by incorporating and adapting valuable principles from various global constitutions to suit India’s unique context.
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who chaired the Constituent Assembly’s drafting committee, famously remarked that the Indian Constitution was shaped by drawing insights from “all the known Constitutions of the World.” Among these influences, the U.S. Constitution was particularly significant.
- Several key elements of the Indian Constitution, including the provision of fundamental rights, the independence of the judiciary, judicial review, mechanisms for the impeachment of the President and judges, and the office of the Vice President, were adapted from the U.S. model
6. Differences between Indian and American
- Despite these similarities, notable distinctions exist between the two constitutions. India’s vibrant multi-party system stands in contrast to the predominantly two-party system in the United States. While India’s Constitution includes fundamental rights that not only shield individuals from state interference but also mandate the promotion of social and economic rights, the U.S. Constitution primarily emphasizes individual liberties and protections against government intrusion.
- India’s Constitution includes specific provisions for declaring a state of emergency, allowing the government special powers in times of crisis. In contrast, the U.S. Constitution lacks formal emergency powers, limiting suspension of certain rights to situations of war or rebellion.
- Both countries are federal, yet India is considered quasi-federal, described as an “indestructible union of destructible states,” while the U.S. is a true federation, often termed an “indestructible union of indestructible states.”
- The judicial structures also differ significantly. India has a unified judiciary with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts and subordinate courts, giving the Supreme Court final authority on constitutional and legal issues. In the U.S., a dual court system exists with separate state and federal courts, where states manage their own legal matters, alongside federal courts handling federal issues.
- Judicial appointments also vary. In India, Supreme Court judges are appointed by the President based on recommendations from the Prime Minister and a collegium of senior judges. In the U.S., Supreme Court justices are nominated by the President and must be confirmed by the Senate
7. Secularism
- India and the United States are both secular nations, but their interpretations of secularism differ. Each country’s constitution reflects its unique sociocultural setting and historical context.
- The U.S. embraces a form of secularism often called “negative secularism,” which establishes a clear separation between religion and government. In this framework, the state remains neutral, neither supporting nor opposing any religion. This model was shaped to prevent a theocratic state or an official religion, issues that had led to significant conflicts in Europe.
- In contrast, India’s secularism, termed “positive secularism,” acknowledges the country’s rich diversity of religions and does not enforce strict separation between religion and state. Instead, the Indian Constitution ensures that no single religion is established as the state religion while granting citizens and non-citizens various religious rights. This approach allows the state to respect all religions equally and, when necessary, intervene in religious matters to protect the rights of communities and maintain social harmony.
- In sum, despite these distinctions, both India and the U.S. are committed to democratic principles and the rule of law. Their constitutions support two dynamic democracies that continue to impact the global political stage.
- As both nations face new challenges in the 21st century, the oldest and the largest democracies can draw valuable insights from one another, with their constitutions remaining central to their success as democratic societies
8. Conclusion
Comparative study of India and the U.S., particularly regarding their governance systems, constitutional frameworks, and concepts of secularism, highlights both the diversity and shared commitment of these two great democracies. Despite significant differences in their political structures—India’s parliamentary, quasi-federal setup with a flexible approach to constitutional amendments versus the U.S.’s presidential, firmly federal system with a rigorous amendment process—both nations uphold the principles of democratic governance and the rule of law.
Their distinct approaches to secularism, rooted in historical contexts, further illustrate how each constitution seeks to balance religious freedoms with national unity. While the U.S. ensures a strict separation between church and state, India’s model embraces a pluralistic approach, allowing the state to engage in religious matters for social equity.
These unique paths have led to the development of two vibrant democracies that influence global politics, each providing lessons in resilience, adaptability, and inclusiveness. Moving forward, India and the U.S., as the world’s largest and oldest democracies, respectively, will continue to navigate the evolving challenges of the 21st century, with their constitutional values serving as the foundation for sustained democratic progress
|
For Prelims: Fifth Schedule, Sixth Schedule, Autonomous distric council
For Mains: 1.Explain the significance of the Fifth Schedule of the Indian Constitution in the context of tribal governance. How does it protect the interests of Scheduled Tribes?
2.Discuss the provisions and objectives of the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. How does it impact the governance of tribal areas in the Northeastern states?
|
|
Previous Year Questions
1.What is/ are true in relation to Autonomous Districts (CGPSC 2021)
1. Each Autonomous District Council has 30 members
2.24 members of the Autonomous District Council are elected via voting and rest 6 are nominated by Governor
3.Rights to direct the Acts passed by the Parliament of India is Autonomous. Districts of Assam lie with Governor
A.1 , 2 and 3
B. 1 and 3
C. 1 and 2
D. 1 Only
Answer (B)
2. Based on the Sixth Schedule of Indian Constitution, with respect to the tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram (DSSSB PRT General Section Officer 2019)
Which of the following can the Governor of a State do?
1. Can create a new autonomous district
2. The area of atonomous district can be increased
A. 1 Only
B. 2 Only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
Answer (C)
|
Source: indianexpress
